SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Form 10-K
(Mark One)
|
||
þ
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2001 | ||
or | ||
o
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR
15(d)
OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
|
For the transition period from to |
Commission file number 0-26946
94-3125814
(State or other jurisdiction of
incorporation or organization)
(I.R.S. Employer
Identification No.)
Registrants telephone number, including
area code: (408) 986-9888
Securities registered pursuant to
Section 12(b) of the Act: None
Title of each class
Name of each Exchange on which registered
None
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by a check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrants knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ
The aggregate market value of voting stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant, as of February 21, 2002 was approximately $13,791,000 (based on the closing price for shares of the Registrants Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq National Market System for the last trading day prior to that date). Shares of Common Stock held by each executive officer, director, and holder of 5% or more of the outstanding Common Stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
On February 20, 2002 approximately 12,060,003 shares of the Registrants Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE.
Portions of the Registrants Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III. Such proxy statement will be filed within 120 days after the end of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as believes, expects, anticipates and the like indicate forward-looking statements. Intevacs actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including those set forth under Certain Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results.
PART I
Item 1. Business
Overview
Intevac, Inc.s businesses are the design, manufacture and sale of complex capital equipment used to manufacture products such as flat panel displays, thin-film disks and electro-optical devices (Equipment) and the development of highly sensitive electro-optical devices and systems (Photonics).
Systems sold by the Equipment Division are typically used to deposit highly engineered thin-films of material on a substrate, or to modify the characteristics and properties of thin-films already deposited on a substrate. Systems manufactured by the Equipment Division generally utilize proprietary manufacturing techniques and processes and operate under high levels of vacuum. The systems are designed for high-volume continuous operation and use precision robotics, computerized controls and complex software programs to fully automate and control the production process. Products manufactured with these systems include color cell phone displays, automotive displays, computer monitors, and thin-film disks for computer hard disk drives. The Equipment Division has also designed ultra-high vacuum automated equipment for the manufacture of low-cost low-light level cameras developed by the Photonics Division and for sale to other manufacturers of electro-optical devices. The Equipment Division recorded sales of $42.7 million in 2001, an increase from $28.8 million in 2000. Equipment Division revenues in 2001 resulted primarily from the sales of new flat panel display (FPD) manufacturing systems and technology upgrades, spare parts and consumables for disk manufacturing equipment.
The Photonics Division is developing electro-optical devices and systems that permit highly sensitive detection of photons in the visible and short wave infrared portions of the spectrum. This development work is aimed at creating new products for both military and industrial applications. Products include LIVAR® systems for positive target identification at long range, low-cost low-light-level cameras for use in security and military applications and photodiodes for use in high-speed fiber optic systems. Photonics Division sales increased to $8.8 million in 2001 from $7.3 million in 2000 and consisted primarily of contract research and development. The Photonics Division has completed approximately $30 million of government-sponsored research and development since 1994.
Equipment
Technology and Strategy |
The Equipment Divisions systems utilize sophisticated vacuum process technologies that are integrated with precision robotics and automated process and system controls. The Companys systems are designed for high volume manufacturing applications and are commonly operated 24 hours a day 7 days a week with high uptime. Process technologies include physical vapor deposition, chemical vapor deposition, fast cooling, rapid thermal processing and ultra high vacuum level processing. Intevacs equipment strategy is to expand into growing equipment markets where its existing technology base can be leveraged to reduce the cost of entry and participation in those markets. For example, the deposition and rapid thermal processing equipment developed to address the FPD market and the equipment developed to manufacture Photonics Division low-cost low-light level cameras, incorporate many of the manufacturing technologies previously developed by the Company for high volume manufacturing of thin-film disks and night vision devices.
1
Deposition Equipment for Flat Panel Display Manufacturing |
The manufacture of several types of flat panel displays, such as active matrix liquid crystal displays, require the deposition of thin-film layers of different materials onto a glass substrate. Intevacs D-Star sputtering systems are designed to uniformly coat thin films on substrates as large as a meter square. Deposition materials include metals such as aluminum and chromium (used as conductors), indium tin oxide (used as transparent conductors) and complex oxides of materials such as magnesium (used in plasma displays), tantalum and silicon. Process modules are positioned around a central handling module designed to provide high throughput. Up to four back-to-back modules, each containing two vacuum isolated chambers, can be attached directly to the central handler unit. Additional back-to-back modules may also be attached in series to provide further process flexibility and capacity. Typically one module is devoted to load/unload and the remaining positions are configured as dedicated process stations. Substrates are loaded into the system with a robot and then held on edge in a vertical orientation as they are processed. Vertical substrate handling allows for a relatively small footprint system, optimizes particulate control and reduces flexing of the substrate.
Rapid Thermal Processing Equipment for Flat Panel Display Manufacturing |
Intevacs rapid thermal processing (RTP) systems rapidly modify the characteristics of thin films deposited on glass substrates used in the manufacture of flat panel displays. Intevacs patented RTP technology enables manufacturers to change the properties of these thin-films by thermally processing the film layer at temperatures that would otherwise distort or destroy the underlying glass substrate. The RTP system employs rapid transient heating, rather than bulk substrate heating, which provides lower cost of ownership and higher throughput as compared to furnace and laser processing techniques. In transient heating, a uniform line of radiation is focused onto a moving substrate, which brings only a narrow stripe of the substrate up to peak process temperature at any time. The substrate remains undistorted because the large majority of its area is relatively cool and acts to stabilize the overall panel. Intevacs RTP systems are typically used for thin-film activation after ion implant in the manufacture of low temperature polysilicon displays. Intevacs RTP system customers include Sanyo, Sharp, Sony, Toppoly and a joint venture of Sony and Toyota.
Equipment for Disk Manufacturing |
Intevac has delivered approximately 110 of its MDP-250 disk manufacturing systems to customers including Fuji Electric, Fujitsu Limited, Hitachi, Komag, Maxtor, Mitsubishi, Nippon Sheet Glass, Seagate Technology, Sony and Trace Storage Technology. Intevacs systems are used by disk manufacturers to apply thin layers of undercoats, magnetic alloys and protective overcoats to both aluminum and glass thin-film disks used in computer hard disk drives. The Company believes that Intevac systems are used to manufacture approximately half the worldwide supply of these disks. The mechanical design of the MDP-250 family has characteristics similar to the cluster tools widely used in semiconductor manufacturing in that each of the twelve process stations is separately vacuum pumped and vacuum isolated. The MDP-250 does not require a carrier or pallet to transport disks through the system. Rather, disks are automatically loaded into the system from cassettes, processed, and then automatically returned to the cassette. A number of process station options are offered, including multiple options for the deposition of thin-films and carbon overcoats, heating stations, cooling stations and cleaning stations. Furthermore, these twelve process stations can be easily reconfigured to accommodate process changes.
The rapid increase in areal density in computer memory storage is requiring the thin-films deposited by our MDP-250 series of equipment to become more complex. This complexity is leading to the need for both new process capabilities and a need for more than twelve process stations. Intevac continues to develop new process capabilities for its installed base of systems. These new capabilities include processes that permit the deposition of ultra-thin diamond-like carbon overcoats, vapor lubrication and, currently in development, multi-layer sources and soft underlayer sources necessary for perpendicular recording. To answer the need for more process stations, Intevac introduced the MDP-200, a modular add-on system that allows manufacturers to seamlessly integrate additional process stations onto their MDP-250 system. The MDP-200 provides the capability to process disks through process stations serially or in parallel, giving manufacturers flexibility to integrate process steps with different process times. Intevac has also developed a suite of system upgrades
2
The process and system technologies that Intevac developed for its MDP-250 systems have been designed to be backwards compatible and, in many cases, field installable. Intevac believes that the primary demand for disk manufacturing equipment for the next few years will be for upgrades to the installed base of systems, rather than for sales of new systems to add capacity. Intevacs strategy is to provide its customers with a cost-effective solution that significantly upgrades and extends the capabilities of their installed base of equipment.
Electron Beam Processing Equipment |
In December 1999, Intevac implemented a plan to terminate its electron beam product line. The plan included the delivery of the three electron beam systems on order, closure of the Hayward facility where the systems were manufactured and a $1.6 million charge related to the plan. In March 2000, the Company sold the electron beam business to Quemex Technology, Ltd. and Quemex assumed responsibility for Intevacs Hayward facility. Intevac retained rights to the three systems on order, which were subsequently sold during 2000 and 2001.
Photonics
History |
Intevacs Photonics products have been developed by a team that initially began working together in the 1980s in the Varian central research labs and night vision business unit. When Intevac was formed in 1991, it acquired Varians night vision business, and the related Varian central research lab activities and technology. The central research lab group became part of the R&D department for Intevacs night vision business and continued to develop Intevacs photocathode technology. In 1995, Intevac sold its night vision business to Litton Industries. However, the technical team remained at Intevac and formed the Photonics Division. Since 1995 the Photonics Division has been further developing its technology, with the majority of its activities being funded by R&D contracts from the United States Government and its contractors. During this period the Photonics Division has also worked collaboratively with other research organizations, including Stanford University, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory.
Technology and Strategy |
The Photonics Division develops and manufactures compact electro-optical devices that permit highly sensitive detection of photons in the visible and short wave infrared portions of the spectrum. One of these sensors is an Electron Bombarded Charge Coupled Device (EBCCD) which was originally developed under a cost-sharing Technology Development Agreement with the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA) from 1996 to 1998.
The sensor has a transparent glass window on one side through which photons are focused onto a photocathode grown on the vacuum side of the window. When photons strike the photocathode through the window, electrons are emitted into the vacuum. These electrons are then electrically accelerated through the vacuum and strike a charge coupled device (CCD) imager, which in turn outputs a high resolution, low noise video signal. These devices are extraordinarily sensitive to infrared light with frequencies just beyond the visible spectrum and are used in the Companys LIVAR target identification system.
A second type of sensor incorporates the same basic technology described above; however, the module contains a Complementary Metal-Oxide-Semiconductor (CMOS) imager instead of a CCD chip. This Electron Bombarded Active Pixel Sensor (EBAPS TM ) imager development was initially funded under a cost sharing project awarded to Intevac by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).
Both of these sensors offer both high sensitivity and high resolution and work well in the visible as well as the near infrared range of the spectrum. The output is high-resolution video, rather than the low-resolution direct view green imagery produced by traditional night vision devices. This frees the user from having to hold
3
LIVAR Target Identification System: |
Intevac integrated its EBCCD sensor with a laser illuminator to create its Laser Illuminated Viewing and Ranging system (LIVAR). The LIVAR system is similar to RADAR, but with a number of improvements. The illuminator is an eye safe laser, rather than a longer wavelength microwave source, and the reflected signal is displayed as a digital video image, rather than as a blip. This enables real time, high-resolution imagery for target identification at much longer ranges than was previously possible.
The potential benefit of the LIVAR system is clear for military conflicts like those in Kosovo and Afghanistan. In such conflicts, casualties to US servicemen are politically unacceptable, and it is preferable for aircraft to operate at high altitudes where they are relatively safe from ground launched missile attacks. It is also unacceptable to inflict collateral damage to the other sides civilians or to other untargeted assets. However, these goals are mutually exclusive unless capability exists for positively identifying targets from long ranges.
Currently the military uses several means for target location and identification including forward-looking infrared (FLIR) systems and RADAR. While these systems can sense targets at relatively long ranges, the resolution is poor, and positive identification is difficult, or impossible. The LIVAR system complements the existing FLIR and RADAR technology and enables long range target identification in addition to target sensing.
The first military program planning the widespread deployment of LIVAR was approved late in 2001. Intevac is under contract for the development phase of the program and volume production is expected to commence in late 2003. In February 2002 Intevac delivered a portable LIVAR targeting and surveillance system to the U.S. Army.
Low Cost Low Light Level Cameras |
Todays low light level cameras, derived from military night vision technology, are too expensive for most commercial applications. Intevacs objective is to reduce this cost to $1,000 per camera, a cost at which the Company believes that large available markets for commercial security cameras, law enforcement and traditional military night vision tubes could be addressed. Intevac is currently developing this low light level video camera with National Semiconductor under a program sponsored by NIST. The NIST program involves the development of a CMOS chip that integrates an active pixel imaging sensor with camera electronics by National Semiconductor, photocathode design, product integration and packaging and development of low cost manufacturing processes by Intevacs Photonics Division, and development of ultra-high vacuum automated processing and assembly equipment by Intevacs Equipment Division. Intevac plans to begin commercial sales late in 2002.
Photodiodes for Fiber Optic Communications |
Photodiodes are an essential part of todays fiber optic communication systems. These systems transmit huge volumes of data at high speed in the form of light pulses transmitted down a thin fiber optic strand. A critical element of these systems is the photodiode that converts light pulses from the fiber optic into electrical signals. Intevac has applied its patented technology to the development of 10 gigabit per second and 40 gigabit per second Indium Gallium Arsenide Indium Phosphide photodiodes. These photodiodes offer significant advantages over conventional Indium Gallium Arsenide detectors by combining high operating speed, good responsivity, low dark current, and high output. Intevac began furnishing samples of these devices in die form to fiber optic system component manufacturers during 2001.
4
Competition
We believe that the principal competitive factors affecting the markets for our products include price, product performance and functionality, integration and manageability of products, customer support and service, reputation and reliability. Intevacs equipment products experience intense competition worldwide from competitors including Anelva Corporation, Ulvac Japan, Ltd. and Unaxis Holdings, Ltd., each of which have sold substantial numbers of systems worldwide. Anelva, Ulvac and Unaxis all have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing and other resources than Intevac. There can be no assurance that Intevacs competitors will not develop enhancements to, or future generations of, competitive products that offer superior price or performance features or that new competitors will not enter Intevacs markets and develop such enhanced products.
Given the lengthy sales cycle and the significant investment required to integrate equipment into the manufacturing process, Intevac believes that once a manufacturer has selected a particular suppliers equipment for a specific application, that manufacturer generally relies upon that suppliers equipment and frequently will continue to purchase any additional equipment for that application from the same supplier. Accordingly, competition for customers in the equipment industry is intense, and suppliers of equipment may offer substantial pricing concessions and incentives to attract new customers or retain existing customers.
Intevac believes that its Photonics products are significantly differentiated from and offer significant advantages over other competing products and technologies and that the Company has favorable patent protection for much of its Photonics technology. However, the Company believes that competitors will arise for its Photonics products, and that these competitors may have greater resources than the Company.
Research and Development
Intevacs products serve markets characterized by rapid technological change and evolving industry standards. Intevac routinely invests substantial amounts in research and development and expects to continue an active development program. Intevacs research and development expenses were $14.5 million, $10.6 million and $14.1 million, respectively, in 2001, 2000 and 1999. Research and development expenses represented 28%, 29% and 33%, respectively, of net revenues in 2001, 2000 and 1999. Intevac expects that research and development spending will decline during 2002 as the result of the completion during 2001 of the majority of the design activities related to development of the D-STAR, RTP and MDP-200 platforms.
Research and development expenses do not include costs of $8.0 million, $6.0 million and $5.9 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, related to Photonics contract research and development which are included in cost of goods sold. Research and development expenses also do not include costs of $0.5 million, $0.7 million and $1.1 million incurred by Intevac in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and reimbursed under the terms of research and development cost sharing agreements related to development of disk and flat panel manufacturing equipment.
Sales Channel, Customers and Marketing
Domestic sales are made by the Companys direct sales force, whereas international sales are made by distributors and representatives that provide services such as sales, installation, warranty and customer support. The Company also has a subsidiary in Singapore to support customers in Southeast Asia. Through the second quarter of 2000, Intevac marketed its flat panel manufacturing equipment to the Far East through its Japanese joint venture, IMAT. During the third quarter of 2000 the Company and its joint venture partner, Matsubo, transferred IMATs activities and employees to Matsubo, which became a distributor of the Companys flat panel products, and shut down the operations of IMAT.
The selling process for Intevacs equipment products is often a multi-level and long-term process involving individuals from marketing, engineering, operations, customer service and senior management. The process involves making samples for the prospective customer and responding to individual needs for moderate levels of machine customization. Installing and integrating new equipment requires a substantial investment by a customer. Sales of Intevacs systems depend, in significant part, upon the decision of a prospective
5
The selling process for Intevacs Photonics business primarily involves the solicitation of contracts and subcontracts from government agencies and from government contractors and subcontractors. Some contracts are bid at a fixed price, some contracts are bid at cost plus a fee and some contracts are bid on a cost-sharing basis. The sales process involves government procurement regulations and is dependant on the continuing availability of government funding for the Companys research programs. Future production orders for Intevacs military products depend on the government funding of weapons systems that will utilize Intevac products such as LIVAR.
Historically, a significant portion of the Companys revenues in any particular period have been attributable to sales to a limited number of customers. In 2001, Equipment sales through Matsubo, the Companys Japanese distributor, accounted for 49% of net revenues. In 2000, MMC Technology, Seagate, Westt and Matsubo each accounted for more than 10% of Intevacs consolidated revenues and in aggregate accounted for 56% of net revenues. In 1999, Matsubo, Seagate and Lockheed Martin each accounted for more than 10% of Intevacs consolidated revenues and in aggregate accounted for 66% of net revenues. Intevacs largest customers change from period to period and it is expected that sales of its products to relatively few customers will continue to account for a high percentage of its net revenues in the foreseeable future.
Foreign sales accounted for 73% of revenues in 2001, 27% of revenues in 2000 and 60% of revenues in 1999. The majority of Intevacs foreign sales are to companies in the Far East and Intevac anticipates that sales to customers in the Far East will continue to be a significant portion of its Equipment revenues.
Customer Support
Intevac provides process and applications support, customer training, installation, start-up assistance and emergency service support to its customers. Process and applications support is provided by Intevacs equipment process engineers who also visit customers at their plants to assist in process development projects. Intevac conducts training classes for process engineers, machine operators and machine service personnel. Additional training is also given during the machine installation. Installation and start up support is generally provided within the United States by the Intevac customer service organization. This group also assists with the installation and start up of systems in overseas locations as required.
Intevac generally provides a one-year warranty on its equipment. During this warranty period any necessary non-consumable parts are supplied and installed. Intevac employees provide field service support primarily in the United States, Singapore and Malaysia. In other countries, field service support is provided by Intevacs distributors and sales representatives, supplemented by Intevac factory support. Intevac and its distributors stock consumables and spare parts to support the installed base of systems. These parts are available on a 24-hour per day basis.
Manufacturing
All of Intevacs manufacturing is conducted at its facility in Santa Clara, California. Intevacs Equipment manufacturing operations include electromechanical assembly, mechanical and vacuum assembly, fabrication of the sputter sources and system assembly, alignment and testing. Intevacs Photonics manufacturing operations include growth of advanced photocathodes and assembly of complex vacuum devices under clean room conditions utilizing a number of advanced processing techniques. Intevac makes extensive use of the infrastructure serving the semiconductor equipment business. Intevac purchases vacuum pumps, valves, instrumentation and fittings, power supplies, printed wiring board assemblies, computers and control circuitry and custom mechanical parts made by forging, machining and welding. Intevac has a well-equipped
6
Intevacs manufacturing strategy is to operate with low fixed costs, to produce high quality, cost-effective systems and low cost replacement parts and to be able to respond effectively to changes in volume. To do this, Intevac currently designs its products to use standard parts where possible. Intevac performs manufacturing activities that add value or that require unique technology or specialized knowledge and, taking advantage of its Silicon Valley location, utilizes subcontractors to perform other manufacturing activities.
Backlog
Intevacs backlog was $30.6 million and $42.1 million at December 31, 2001 and December 31, 2000, respectively. Intevac includes in its backlog only those customer orders for systems, component parts and contract research and development for which it has accepted signed purchase orders with assigned delivery dates. The equipment requirements of Intevacs customers cannot be determined with accuracy, and therefore Intevacs backlog at any certain date may not be indicative of future demand for Intevacs products.
The reduction in backlog was primarily due to a reduction in the number of FPD deposition systems on order. The Company delivered 5 systems in 2001 and has 1 system in backlog at December 31, 2001. Intevacs backlog at December 31, 2001 is mostly scheduled for delivery or customer acceptance during the first half of 2002.
Patents and Licensing
Intevac currently holds 36 patents issued in the United States and 22 patents issued in foreign countries, and has patent applications pending in the United States and foreign countries. Of the 36 U.S. patents, 12 relate to disk equipment, 12 relate to flat panel equipment and 12 relate to photonics. Four foreign patents relate to disk equipment, 5 relate to flat panel equipment and 13 relate to photonics. In addition, Intevac has the right to utilize certain patents under licensing arrangements with Litton Industries, Stanford University, Lawrence Livermore Laboratories and Alum Rock Technology.
Employees
At December 31, 2001, Intevac had 183 employees, including 7 contract employees. 84 of these employees were in research and development, 67 in manufacturing, and 32 in administration, customer support and marketing.
Certain Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results
$37.5 Million of convertible notes are outstanding and will mature in 2004. |
In connection with the sale of $57.5 million of its 6 1/2% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due 2004 (the Convertible Notes) in February 1997, Intevac incurred a substantial increase in the ratio of long-term debt to total capitalization (shareholders equity plus long-term debt). At the noteholders option, the Convertible Notes may be exchanged, prior to maturity, into Intevac common shares at a price of $20.625 per share, which is substantially above current market price. During 2001 and 1999 Intevac spent a total of $11.9 million to repurchase $20.0 million of the Convertible Notes. The $37.5 million of the Convertible Notes that remain outstanding as of December 31, 2001 commit Intevac to substantial principal and interest obligations that are significantly in excess of the Companys $18.2 million cash balance at December 31, 2001. Intevac may, from time to time, repurchase and retire additional Convertible Notes prior to their maturity date.
The degree to which Intevac is leveraged could have an adverse effect on Intevacs ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, acquisitions or other purposes, and could make it more vulnerable to industry downturns and competitive pressures. Intevacs ability to meet its debt service obligations will be dependent on Intevacs future performance, which will be subject to financial, business and other factors affecting the operations of Intevac, many of which are beyond its control. In the event that the Companys noteholders do not choose to exchange their Convertible Notes for Intevac common stock prior to the
7
The majority of Intevacs new products address new and emerging markets. |
Intevac has invested heavily in the development of products that address new markets. The Equipment Division has developed a flexible deposition tool and a rapid thermal processing tool to address growing segments of the FPD equipment market that are intended to displace products offered by competing manufacturers. The Photonics Divisions LIVAR target identification system and low-cost low-light level camera products are designed to offer significantly improved capability relative to any products currently offered in the marketplace. Additionally, the Photonics Division is entering a new market for the Company with its photodiodes for fiber optic communication systems. Failure of these products to perform as intended or to successfully penetrate these new markets and develop into profitable product lines will have an adverse effect on Intevacs business.
Demand for capital equipment is cyclical. |
Intevacs sells capital equipment to capital intensive industries, which sell commodity products such as flat panel displays and disk drives. These industries operate with high fixed costs. When demand for these commodity products exceeds capacity, then demand for new capital equipment such as Intevacs tends to be amplified. When supply of these commodity products exceeds capacity, then demand for new capital equipment such as Intevacs tends to be depressed. The cyclical nature of the capital equipment industry means that in some years sales of new systems by the Company will be unusually high, and that in other years sales of new systems by the Company will be severely depressed. Failure to anticipate or respond quickly to the industry business cycle could have an adverse effect on Intevacs business.
The Equipment Business is subject to rapid technical change. |
Intevacs ability to remain competitive requires substantial investments in research and development. The failure to develop, manufacture and market new systems, or to enhance existing systems, will have an adverse effect on Intevacs business. From time to time in the past, Intevac has experienced delays in the introduction of, and technical difficulties with, some of its systems and enhancements. Intevacs future success in developing and selling equipment will depend upon a variety of factors, including accurate prediction of future customer requirements, technology advances, cost of ownership, introduction of new products on schedule, cost-effective manufacturing and product performance in the field. Intevacs new product decisions and development commitments must anticipate continuously evolving industry requirements significantly in advance of sales. Any failure to accurately predict customer requirements and to develop new generations of products to meet those requirements would have an adverse effect on Intevacs business.
Our products are complex, constantly evolving and are often designed and manufactured to individual customer requirements that require additional engineering. |
Intevacs Equipment Division products have a large number of components and are highly complex. Intevac may experience delays and technical and manufacturing difficulties in future introductions or volume production of new systems or enhancements. In addition, some of the systems built by Intevac must be customized to meet individual customer site or operating requirements. Intevac has limited manufacturing capacity and engineering resources and may be unable to complete the development, manufacture and shipment of its products, or to meet the required technical specifications for its products in a timely manner. Such delays could lead to rescheduling of orders in backlog, or in extreme situations, to cancellation of orders. In addition, Intevac may incur substantial unanticipated costs early in a products life cycle, such as increased engineering, manufacturing, installation and support costs which may not be able to be passed on to the customer. In some instances, Intevac is dependent upon a sole supplier or a limited number of suppliers for
8
The Photonics Business does not yet generate significant revenues from product sales. |
To date the activities of the Photonics Division have concentrated on the development of its technology and prototype products that demonstrate this technology. Revenues have been derived primarily from research and development contracts funded by the United States Government and its contractors. The Company continues to develop standard Photonics products for sale to military and commercial customers. The Photonics Division will require substantial further investment in sales and marketing, in product development and in additional production facilities to support the planned transition to volume sales of Photonics products to military and commercial customers. There can be no assurance that the Company will succeed in these activities and generate significant sales of products based on its Photonics technology.
The sales of our Equipment products are dependent on substantial capital investment by our customers. |
The purchase of Intevacs systems, along with the purchase of other related equipment and facilities, requires extremely large capital expenditures by our customers. These costs are far in excess of the cost of the Intevac systems alone. The magnitude of such capital expenditures requires that our customers have access to large amounts of capital and that they be willing to invest that capital over long periods of time to be able to purchase our equipment. Some of our customers may not be willing, or able, to make the magnitude of capital investment required.
Rapid increases in areal density are reducing the number of thin-film disks required per disk drive. |
Over the past few years the amount of data that can be stored on a single thin-film computer disk has been increasing at approximately 100% per year. Although the number of disk drives produced has continued to increase each year, the growth in areal density has resulted in a reduction in the number of disks required per disk drive. TrendFocus, a market research firm specializing in the disk drive industry, projects that the number of thin-film disks used worldwide declined in 2001 from 2000 levels and are expected to remain at the same level in 2002. Without a significant technological change or an increase in the number of disks required, Intevacs disk equipment sales are largely limited to upgrades of existing systems, rather than capacity expansion or system replacement.
Our competitors are large and well financed and competition is intense. |
Intevac experiences intense competition in the Equipment Division. For example, Intevacs equipment products experience competition worldwide from competitors including Anelva Corporation, Ulvac Japan, Ltd. and Unaxis Holdings, Ltd., each of which have sold substantial numbers of systems worldwide. Anelva, Ulvac and Unaxis all have substantially greater financial, technical, marketing, manufacturing and other resources than Intevac. There can be no assurance that Intevacs competitors will not develop enhancements to, or future generations of, competitive products that will offer superior price or performance features or that new competitors will not enter Intevacs markets and develop such enhanced products.
Given the lengthy sales cycle and the significant investment required to integrate equipment into the manufacturing process, Intevac believes that once a manufacturer has selected a particular suppliers equipment for a specific application, that manufacturer generally relies upon that suppliers equipment and frequently will continue to purchase any additional equipment for that application from the same supplier. Accordingly, competition for customers in the equipment industry is intense, and suppliers of equipment may offer substantial pricing concessions and incentives to attract new customers or retain existing customers.
9
Intevacs business is dependent on its intellectual property. |
There can be no assurance that:
| any of Intevacs pending or future patent applications will be allowed or that any of the allowed applications will be issued as patents, or | |
| any patent owned by Intevac will not be invalidated, deemed unenforceable, circumvented or challenged, or | |
| the rights granted under our patents will provide competitive advantages to Intevac, or | |
| any of Intevacs pending or future patent applications will be issued with claims of the scope sought by Intevac, if at all, or | |
| others will not develop similar products, duplicate Intevacs products or design around the patents owned by Intevac, or | |
| patent rights, intellectual property laws or Intevacs agreements will adequately protect Intevacs intellectual property rights. |
Failure to adequately protect Intevacs intellectual property rights could have an adverse effect upon Intevacs business.
From time to time Intevac has received claims that it is infringing third parties intellectual property rights. There can be no assurance that third parties will not in the future claim infringement by Intevac with respect to current or future patents, trademarks, or other proprietary rights relating to Intevacs disk sputtering systems, flat panel manufacturing equipment or other products. Any present or future claims, with or without merit, could be time-consuming, result in costly litigation, cause product shipment delays or require Intevac to enter into royalty or licensing agreements. Such royalty or licensing agreements, if required, may not be available on terms acceptable to Intevac, or at all. Any of the foregoing could have an adverse effect upon Intevacs business.
Our operating results fluctuate significantly. |
Over the last eight quarters Intevacs operating loss as a percentage of net revenues has fluctuated between approximately (59%) and (1%) of net revenues. Over the same period sales per quarter have fluctuated between $23.6 million and $5.9 million. Intevac anticipates that its sales and operating margins will continue to fluctuate. As a result, period-to-period comparisons of its results of operations are not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as indications of future performance.
Operating costs in northern California are high. |
Intevacs operations are located in Santa Clara, California. The cost of living in northern California is extremely high, which increases both the cost of doing business and the cost and difficulty of recruiting new employees. Intevacs operating results depend in significant part upon its ability to effectively manage costs and to retain and attract qualified management, engineering, marketing, manufacturing, customer support, sales and administrative personnel. The failure to control costs and to attract and retain qualified personnel could have an adverse effect on Intevacs business.
Business interruptions could adversely affect our business. |
Intevacs operations are vulnerable to interruption by fire, earthquake, power loss, telecommunications failure and other events beyond our control. Additionally, the costs of electricity and natural gas have increased significantly. Any further cost increases will impact the Companys ability to achieve profitability.
10
A majority of our sales are to international customers. |
Sales and operating activities outside of the United States are subject to inherent risks, including fluctuations in the value of the United States dollar relative to foreign currencies, tariffs, quotas, taxes and other market barriers, political and economic instability, restrictions on the export or import of technology, potentially limited intellectual property protection, difficulties in staffing and managing international operations and potentially adverse tax consequences. Intevac earns a significant portion of its revenue from international sales, and there can be no assurance that any of these factors will not have an adverse effect on Intevacs business.
Intevac generally quotes and sells its products in US dollars. However, in some cases, Intevac has quoted and sold its products in Japanese Yen. In those cases Intevac may enter into foreign currency contracts in an effort to reduce the overall risk of currency fluctuations to Intevacs business. However, there can be no assurance that the offer and sale of products denominated in foreign currencies, and the related foreign currency hedging activities will not adversely affect Intevacs business.
Intevacs two principal competitors for disk sputtering equipment are based in foreign countries and have cost structures based on foreign currencies. Accordingly, currency fluctuations could cause Intevacs products to be more, or less, competitive than its competitors products. Currency fluctuations will decrease, or increase, Intevacs cost structure relative to those of its competitors, which could impact Intevacs competitive position.
Intevacs stock price is volatile. |
Intevacs stock price has experienced both significant increases in valuation, and significant decreases in valuation, over short periods of time. Intevac believes that factors such as announcements of developments related to Intevacs business, fluctuations in Intevacs operating results, failure to meet securities analysts expectations, general conditions in the disk drive and thin-film media manufacturing industries and the worldwide economy, announcements of technological innovations, new systems or product enhancements by Intevac or its competitors, fluctuations in the level of cooperative development funding, acquisitions, changes in governmental regulations, developments in patents or other intellectual property rights and changes in Intevacs relationships with customers and suppliers could cause the price of Intevacs Common Stock to continue to fluctuate substantially. In addition, in recent years the stock market in general, and the market for small capitalization and high technology stocks in particular, has experienced extreme price fluctuations which have often been unrelated to the operating performance of affected companies. Any of these factors could adversely affect the market price of Intevacs Common Stock.
Intevac routinely evaluates acquisition candidates and other diversification strategies. |
Intevac has completed multiple acquisitions as part of its efforts to expand and diversify its business. For example, Intevacs business was initially acquired from Varian Associates in 1991. Additionally, Intevac acquired its current gravity lubrication, CSS test equipment and rapid thermal processing product lines in three acquisitions. Intevac also acquired its RPC electron beam processing business in late 1997, and subsequently closed this business. Intevac intends to continue to evaluate new acquisition candidates and diversification strategies. Any acquisition will involve numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of the acquired companys employees, operations and products, uncertainties associated with operating in new markets and working with new customers, and the potential loss of the acquired companys key employees. Additionally, unanticipated expenses, difficulties and consequences may be incurred relating to the integration of technologies, research and development, and administrative functions. Any future acquisitions may result in potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, acquisition related write-offs and the assumption of debt and contingent liabilities. Any of the above factors could adversely affect Intevacs business.
Intevac uses hazardous materials. |
Intevac is subject to a variety of governmental regulations relating to the use, storage, discharge, handling, emission, generation, manufacture, treatment and disposal of toxic or otherwise hazardous substances, chemicals, materials or waste. Any failure to comply with current or future regulations could result
11
A majority of the Common Stock outstanding is controlled by the directors and executive officers of Intevac. |
Based on the shares outstanding on December 31, 2001, the current directors and their affiliates and executive officers, in the aggregate, beneficially own a majority of the outstanding shares of Common Stock. These shareholders, acting together, are able to effectively control all matters requiring approval by the shareholders of Intevac, including the election of a majority of the directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. The Companys directors also hold 7% of the outstanding Convertible Notes.
Item 2. Properties
Intevac leases its 119,583 square foot facility in Santa Clara, California. The lease for this building expires in March 2007. Intevac has an option to extend the lease for an additional five-year period, with a monthly base rent to be negotiated by Intevac and the lessor. If Intevac and the lessor are unable to reach agreement with respect to such monthly base rent, an appraisal process set forth in the lease will determine the monthly base rent for the extension. Intevac also leases a facility of approximately 2,400 square feet in Singapore to house the Singapore customer support organization. This lease expires in December 2002. Intevac believes that its current facilities are suitable and adequate for its current and foreseeable operations. Intevac operates with one full manufacturing shift and one partial manufacturing shift. Intevac believes that it currently has sufficient productive capacity to meet its current needs.
Item 3. Legal Proceedings
On June 12, 1996 two Australian Army Black Hawk Helicopters collided in midair during nighttime maneuvers. Eighteen Australian servicemen perished and twelve were injured. The Company was named as a defendant in a lawsuit related to this crash. The lawsuit was filed in Stamford, Connecticut Superior Court on June 10, 1999 by Mark Durkin, the administrator of the estates of the deceased crewmembers, the injured crewmembers and the spouses of the deceased and/or injured crewmembers. Included in the suits allegations are assertions that the crash was caused by defective night vision goggles. The suit names three US manufacturers of military night vision goggles, of which Intevac was one. The suit also names the manufacturer of the pilots helmets, two manufacturers of night vision system test equipment and the manufacturer of the helicopter. The suit claims damages for 13 personnel killed in the crash, 5 personnel injured in the crash and spouses of those killed or injured. It is known that the Australian Army established a Board of Inquiry to investigate the accident and that the Board of Inquiry concluded that the accident was not caused by defective night vision goggles.
On July 27, 2000 the Connecticut Superior Court disallowed the defendants motion to dismiss the lawsuit. That decision was appealed to the Connecticut Supreme Court. On October 30, 2001 the Connecticut Supreme Court reversed the Superior Courts decision and remanded the case to the trial court with the direction to grant the defendants motions to dismiss the suit subject to conditions already agreed to by the defendants. These conditions agreed to by the defendants include (1) consenting to jurisdiction in Australia; (2) accepting service of process in connection with an action in Australia; (3) making their personnel and records available for litigation in Australia; (4) waiving any applicable statutes of limitation in Australia up to six months from the date of dismissal of this action or for such other reasonable time as may be required as a condition of dismissing this action; (5) satisfying any judgement that may be entered against them in Australia; and (6) consenting to the reopening of the action in Connecticut in the event the above conditions are not met as to any proper defendant in the action. At this time, the plaintiffs have not chosen to
12
On June 12, 2001 the Company filed a complaint in Santa Clara County Superior Court, State of California, against Intarsia Corporation. The complaint related to Intarsias cancellation of an order for a customized sputtering system and sought damages of at least $3.3 million. On July 26, 2001 Intarsia filed a cross-complaint against the Company in the Santa Clara County Superior Court. On August 14, 2001, the Company filed a demurrer to the cross-complaint, and on October 11, 2001, Intarsia filed an amended cross-complaint. The amended cross-complaint included allegations of fraud, negligent misrepresentation, breach of contract and breach of covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and sought damages in the amount of $349,000 plus additional relief as may have been deemed appropriate by the court. On February 1, 2002 the Company and Intarsia executed a stipulation for settlement which resolved the matter. The terms of the stipulation will not result in any material effect on the Companys financial results.
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security-Holders
No matters were submitted to a vote of security-holders during the fourth quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Certain information about Intevacs
directors and executive officers is listed below:
Mr. Pond
is a
founder of Intevac and has served as Chairman of the Board since
February 1991. Mr. Pond served as President and Chief
Executive Officer from February 1991 until July 2000 and again
from September 2001 through January 2002. Before joining
Intevac, from 1988 to 1990, Mr. Pond served as President
and Chief Operating Officer of Varian Associates, Inc., a
publicly held manufacturer of semiconductor, communication,
defense and medical products where he was responsible for
overall management of Varians operations. From 1984 to
1988, Mr. Pond was President of Varians Electron
Device and Systems Group and became a Director of Varian in
1986. Mr. Pond holds a BS in physics from the University of
Missouri at Rolla and a MS in physics from the University of
California at Los Angeles.
Mr. Fairbairn
joined Intevac as President and Chief
Executive Officer in January 2002 and was appointed a Director
of the Company in February 2002. Before joining Intevac, from
July 1985 to January 2002, Mr. Fairbairn was employed by
Applied Materials, most recently as Vice-President and General
Manager of the Conductor Etch Organization with responsibility
for the Silicon and Metal Etch Divisions. From 1996 to 1999,
Mr. Fairbairn was General Manager of Applieds Plasma
Enhanced Chemical Vapor Deposition
13
Mr. Aebi
has
served as President of the Photonics Division since July 2000.
Mr. Aebi served as General Manager of the Photonics
Division since May 1995 and was elected as a Vice President of
the Company in September 1995. From 1988 through 1994,
Mr. Aebi was the Engineering Manager of the Companys
night vision business, where he was responsible for new product
development in the areas of advanced photocathodes and image
intensifiers. Mr. Aebi holds a BS in physics and an MS in
electrical engineering from Stanford University.
Mr. Eddy
has
served as Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief
Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary of Intevac since
April 1991. Mr. Eddy served as Chief Financial Officer of
Videonics, Inc., a manufacturer of consumer video editing
equipment, from 1987 to 1991 and served as Chief Financial
Officer of Parallel Computers, Inc., a startup computer company,
from 1983 to 1987. Mr. Eddy was with Intel Corporation from
1974 to 1983 where he served in a variety of positions,
including controller and plant manager. Mr. Eddy holds a BS
in engineering science from the University of Virginia and a MBA
from Dartmouth College.
Mr. Durbin
has
served as a Director of Intevac since February 1991.
Mr. Durbin joined Kaiser Aerospace and Electronics
Corporation, a privately held manufacturer of electronic and
electro-optical systems, in 1975 and served as Vice Chairman
with responsibility for marketing and business development until
January 2001. Mr. Durbin holds a BS in electrical
engineering from The Cooper Union and a MS in electrical
engineering from the Polytechnic Institute of Brooklyn.
Mr. Farinsky
has served as a Director of Intevac
since May 2001. Mr. Farinsky has been an investor and
consultant since he retired as a corporate financial executive
in 1991. From 1987 to 1991 he was Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer of Ashton-Tate Corporation. Prior to
joining Ashton-Tate, he held executive management positions at
the Bank of British Columbia, Dysan Corporation, Kaiser
Resources, Ltd, Kaiser Industries Corporation, Mattel, Inc. and
Teledyne, Inc. Mr. Farinsky holds a BS in business
administration from the University of San Francisco and is a
Certified Public Accountant licensed in California, but is not
engaged in public practice. Mr. Farinsky is also a director
of Broadcom Corporation.
Dr. Hempstead
has served as a Director of Intevac
since March 1997 and served as Chief Operating Officer of
Intevac from April 1996 through June 1999. Before joining
Intevac, Dr. Hempstead served as Executive Vice President
of Censtor Corp., a manufacturer of computer disk drive heads
and disks, from November 1994 to February 1996. He was a
self-employed consultant from 1989 to November 1994.
Dr. Hempstead is currently Chief Technology Officer at
Veeco Instruments. Dr. Hempstead holds a BS and MS in
electrical engineering from Massachusetts Institute of
Technology and a Ph.D. in physics from the University of
Illinois.
Dr. Lambeth
has
served as a Director of Intevac since May 1996. Dr. Lambeth
has been Professor of both Electrical and Computer Engineering
and Material Science Engineering at Carnegie Mellon University
since 1989. Dr. Lambeth was Associate Director of the Data
Storage Systems at Carnegie Mellon University from 1989 to 1999.
Since 1988, Dr. Lambeth has been the owner of Lambeth
Systems, an engineering consulting and research firm. From 1973
to 1988, Dr. Lambeth worked at Eastman Kodak Companys
Research Laboratories, most recently as the head of the Magnetic
Materials Laboratory. Dr. Lambeth holds a BS in electrical
engineering from the University of Missouri and a Ph.D. in
physics from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.
Dr. Smead
has
served as a Director of Intevac since February 1991.
Dr. Smead joined Kaiser Aerospace and Electronics
Corporation (Kaiser) in 1974 and served as
Kaisers President from 1974 until October 1997.
Dr. Smead served as President and Chairman of the Board of
Directors of K Systems, Inc., Kaisers parent company, from
1977 until October 1997. Dr. Smead served as Chairman of
the Board of Directors of Kaiser until December 1999.
Dr. Smead resigned as a director of Kaiser and its
subsidiaries in December 2000. Dr. Smead holds a BS in
electrical engineering from the University of Colorado, a MS in
electrical engineering from the University of Washington and a
Ph.D. in electrical engineering from Purdue University.
14
Name
Age
Position
Executive Officers and Directors:
63
48
47
51
74
67
58
54
76
(1)
Member of Audit Committee
(2)
Member of Compensation Committee
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
PART II
Item 5. Market for Registrants Common Equity and Related Shareholder Matters
Intevacs Common Stock commenced trading on
the Nasdaq National Market on November 21, 1995 and is
traded under the symbol IVAC. As of
December 31, 2001, there were approximately 2,000 holders
of record of the Common Stock. The following table sets forth
for the periods indicated the high and low closing sale prices
for the Common Stock as reported on the Nasdaq National Market.
High
Low
$
8.000
$
3.500
$
4.625
$
2.688
$
7.090
$
3.313
$
5.130
$
3.130
$
5.890
$
3.500
$
5.950
$
4.400
$
4.980
$
1.950
$
4.240
$
2.380
Dividend Policy
Intevac currently anticipates that it will retain its earnings, if any, for use in the operation of its business and does not expect to pay cash dividends on its capital stock in the foreseeable future.
15
Item 6. Selected Consolidated Financial Data
The following selected financial data of Intevac
is qualified by reference to and should be read in conjunction
with the consolidated financial statements of Intevac, including
the notes thereto, and Managements Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, each appearing
elsewhere in this report.
Year Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
1998
1997
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
51,484
$
36,049
$
42,962
$
95,975
$
133,207
41,729
34,059
40,410
71,717
91,255
9,755
1,990
2,552
24,258
41,952
14,478
10,576
14,136
12,473
10,716
6,745
4,415
7,226
10,879
11,399
(638
)
3,069
1,088
299
21,223
14,353
24,431
24,710
22,414
(11,468
)
(12,363
)
(21,879
)
(452
)
19,538
(2,912
)
(3,033
)
(3,711
)
(4,187
)
(3,581
)
1,065
3,072
3,632
3,176
3,268
(13,315
)
(12,324
)
(21,958
)
(1,463
)
19,225
4,424
(8,344
)
(882
)
6,728
(17,739
)
(12,324
)
(13,614
)
(581
)
12,497
1,005
803
3,844
$
(16,936
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
$
424
$
12,497
$
(1.48
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(1.16
)
$
(0.05
)
$
1.00
$
(1.42
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(0.83
)
$
0.04
$
1.00
11,955
11,803
11,777
12,052
12,514
$
(1.48
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(1.16
)
$
(0.05
)
$
0.94
$
(1.42
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(0.83
)
$
0.03
$
0.94
11,955
11,803
11,777
12,354
15,385
$
18,157
$
38,403
$
40,895
$
60,916
$
71,142
27,160
41,093
51,579
77,774
78,025
60,165
83,936
94,382
122,976
147,794
37,545
41,245
43,188
59,461
59,480
1,408
17,804
29,623
40,436
42,435
16
Item 7. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements which involve risks and uncertainties. Words such as believes, expects, anticipates and the like indicate forward-looking statements. Intevacs actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements for a variety of reasons, including those set forth under Certain Factors Which May Affect Future Operating Results and should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and related Notes contained elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
Managements discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP). We review the accounting policies we use in reporting our financial results on a regular basis. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to revenue recognition, accounts receivable, inventories, income taxes, warranty obligations, long-lived assets, contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities. Results may differ from these estimates due to actual outcomes being different from those on which we based our assumptions. These estimates and judgments are reviewed by management on an ongoing basis. The Audit Committee and our auditors review significant estimates and judgements at the end of each quarter prior to the public release of our financial results.
Our significant accounting policies are described in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements included in Item 8 of this Form 10-K. We believe the following critical accounting policies affect the more significant judgments and estimates made in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements.
Revenue Recognition Intevac recognizes revenue using the guidance from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 Revenue Recognition in Financial Statements. Intevacs revenue recognition policy requires that there be persuasive evidence of a sales contract, that the price is fixed, that title has transferred, that product payment is not contingent on any factors and is reasonably assured, and that the Company has completed all the material tasks and deliverables required by the contract.
Revenues for systems are recognized upon customer acceptance. For large deposition and RTP systems shipped through a distributor, revenue is typically recognized after the distributor has accepted the system at Intevacs factory and the system has been shipped. For large deposition and RTP systems sold direct to end customers, revenue is recognized after installation and acceptance of the system at the customer site. When the Company believes that there may be higher than normal end user installation and acceptance issues for systems shipped through a distributor, such as when the first unit of a newly designed system is delivered, then the Company defers revenue recognition until the distributors customer has also accepted the system. Revenues for technology upgrades, spare parts, consumable and prototype products built by the Photonics Division are generally recognized upon shipment. Service and maintenance contract revenue, which to date has been insignificant, is recognized ratably over applicable contract periods or as the service is performed.
The Company performs best efforts research and development work under various research contracts. Revenue on these contracts is recognized in accordance with contract terms, typically as costs are incurred. Typically, for each contract, the Company commits to perform certain research and development efforts up to an agreed upon amount. In connection with these contracts, the Company receives funding on an incremental basis up to a ceiling. Some of these contracts are cost sharing in nature, where Intevac is reimbursed for a portion of the total costs expended. In addition, the Company has, from time to time, negotiated with a third party to fund a portion of the Companys costs in return for a joint interest to the Companys rights at the end of the contract. In the event a particular contract over-runs its agreed upon amount, the Company may be liable for the additional costs.
17
Inventories Intevac makes provisions for potentially excess and obsolete inventory based on backlog and forecasted demand. However, order backlog is subject to revisions, cancellations, and rescheduling. Actual demand will inevitably differ from forecasted demand due to a number of factors. For example, the thin-film disk industry has suffered from over capacity and poor financial results, which has led to industry consolidation. Consolidation can lead to the availability of used equipment that competes at very low prices with the Companys products. Financial stress and consolidation in the Companys customer base can also lead to the cancellation of orders for products after the Company has incurred substantial costs related to those orders. Such problems have resulted, and may continue to result, in excess and obsolete inventory, and the provision of related reserves.
Warranty The Companys standard warranty is twelve months from customer acceptance. During this warranty period any necessary non-consumable parts are supplied and installed. A provision for the estimated warranty cost is recorded at the time revenue is recognized.
Valuation of long-lived and intangible assets and goodwill We assess the impairment of identifiable intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could trigger an impairment review include the following:
| significant underperformance relative to expected historical or projected future operating results; | |
| significant changes in the manner of our use of the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business; | |
| significant negative industry or economic trends; | |
| significant decline in our stock price for a sustained period; and | |
| our market capitalization relative to net book value. |
When we determine that the carrying value of
long-lived assets, intangibles or goodwill may not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above
indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate
determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in our current business model.
Results of Operations
Net revenues.
Net
revenues consist primarily of sales of equipment used to
manufacture flat panel displays, equipment used to manufacture
thin-film disks, related equipment and system components, and
contract research and development related to the development of
electro-optical devices and systems. Net revenues totaled
$51.5 million, $36.0 million and $43.0 million in
2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Equipment revenues totaled $42.7 million,
$28.8 million and $36.0 million in 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively. Equipment revenues increased in 2001 due to
an increase in sales of flat panel manufacturing systems,
partially offset by a decrease in sales of disk manufacturing
systems, disk system upgrades and components. Equipment revenues
decreased in 2000 from 1999 primarily due to a decrease in sales
of disk manufacturing systems, and to a lesser extent flat panel
manufacturing systems, partially offset by increased sales of
disk system upgrades and components. Intevac believes that the
market for FPD deposition equipment has significant growth
potential. The Company delivered five of its D-STAR deposition
systems during 2001 and at the end of 2001 had backlog for
upgrades to the five systems and one new D-STAR. Nonetheless,
the Company will need to broaden its customer base and secure
additional D-STAR orders during the first half of 2002 to be
able increase D-STAR sales in 2002. Additionally, the market for
the Companys disk manufacturing equipment continues to
face over-capacity and is undergoing consolidation. Future
growth in this market will depend on the overall health of the
industry, the availability of used equipment and technical
obsolescence of the installed base of systems.
Photonics revenues totaled $8.8 million,
$7.2 million and $7.0 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. Photonics revenues increased in 2001 over 2000 as
the result of increased revenues from contract
18
Intevacs backlog of orders at
December 31, 2001 was $30.6 million as compared to a
December 31, 2000 backlog of $42.1 million. The
reduction in backlog was primarily due to a reduction in the
number of FPD deposition systems on order. Most of
Intevacs backlog at December 31, 2001 is scheduled
for either customer acceptance or delivery during the first half
of 2002. The Company needs to book substantial orders with
delivery scheduled in the second half of 2002 to cause 2002
sales to meet or exceed 2001 sales.
Significant portions of the Companys
revenues in any particular period have been attributable to
sales to a limited number of customers. In 2001, Equipment sales
through Matsubo, the Companys Japanese distributor,
accounted for 49% of net revenues. In 2000, MMC Technology,
Seagate, Westt and Matsubo each accounted for more than 10% of
Intevacs consolidated revenues and in aggregate accounted
for 56% of net revenues. In 1999, Matsubo, Seagate and Lockheed
Martin each accounted for more than 10% of Intevacs
consolidated revenues and in aggregate accounted for 66% of net
revenues. The Companys largest customers tend to change
from period to period as a function of each customers
plans to renovate or to expand production capacity.
International sales totaled $37.3 million,
$9.6 million and $25.7 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively. International sales accounted for 73%, 27% and 60%
of net revenues in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The
increase in international sales in 2001 over 2000 was primarily
due to an increase in net revenues from flat panel manufacturing
systems. The decrease in international sales from 1999 to 2000
was primarily due to a decrease in net revenues from disk
manufacturing equipment. Substantially all of Intevacs
international sales are to customers in the Far East.
Gross margin.
Cost
of net revenues consists primarily of purchased materials,
fabrication, assembly, test and installation labor and overhead,
warranty costs, royalties, provisions for inventory reserves,
scrap and costs attributable to contract research and
development. Gross margin was 19%, 6% and 6% in 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively.
Gross margin in the Equipment Division was 23%,
12% and 7% in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Equipment gross
margin improved in 2001, but was tempered by high initial costs
to manufacture Intevacs redesigned flat panel
manufacturing systems and establishment of $2.4 million of
inventory reserves related to a cancelled order for a custom
flat panel system. 2001 Equipment gross margin excluding the
effect of the inventory reserve would have been 29%. Equipment
gross margin in 2000 was negatively impacted by establishment of
$5.1 million of reserves related to slow moving equipment
inventory and a $0.8 million write-off of goodwill related to
electronically swept source technology, which was acquired in
1996 and subsequently abandoned. 2000 Equipment gross margin
excluding the effect of these two items would have been 32%.
Gross margin in 1999 was adversely impacted by the
under-absorption of manufacturing overhead due to low
manufacturing volume, the sale of four used disk sputtering
systems at heavily discounted prices, high initial costs of two
new systems, write-down of RPC inventory related to the plan to
discontinue RPC operations, payment of $0.5 million as part
of the settlement of a patent claim and establishment of a
$0.4 million cost to market reserve on a used MDP-250B disk
sputtering system remaining in inventory.
Gross margin in the Photonics Division was (2%),
(8%) and 7% in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Photonics
gross margins in 2001 and 2000 have been negatively impacted by
a significant portion of revenue being derived from cost-sharing
research and development contracts versus fully funded research
and development contracts in years prior to 2000. The Company
expects that Photonics gross margins will fluctuate based on the
relative mix of sales derived from prototype products, from
fully funded research and development contracts and from
cost-shared research and development contracts.
19
Research and development.
Research and development expense
consists primarily of prototype materials, salaries and related
costs of employees engaged in ongoing research, design and
development activities for flat panel manufacturing equipment,
disk manufacturing equipment and research by the Photonics
Division. Company funded research and development expense
totaled $14.5 million, $10.6 million and
$14.1 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The
increase from 2000 to 2001 was primarily the result of increased
expenses related to the development and redesign of flat panel
manufacturing equipment and, to a lesser extent, the development
of Photonics products. The decrease from 1999 to 2000 was
primarily the result of lower expenses related to the
development of disk manufacturing equipment.
Research and development expenses do not include
costs of $8.0 million, $6.0 million and
$5.9 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, related
to Photonics contract research and development which are
included in cost of goods sold. Research and development
expenses also do not include costs of $0.5 million,
$0.7 million and $1.1 million incurred by Intevac in
2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively, and reimbursed under the
terms of research and development cost sharing agreements
related to development of disk and flat panel manufacturing
equipment.
Selling, general and administrative.
Selling, general and administrative
expense consists primarily of selling, marketing, customer
support, financial, travel, management, legal and professional
services and bad debt expense. Domestic sales are made by the
Companys direct sales force, whereas international sales
are made by distributors and representatives that provide
services such as sales, installation, warranty and customer
support. The Company also has a subsidiary in Singapore to
support customers in Southeast Asia. Through the second quarter
of 2000, Intevac marketed its flat panel manufacturing equipment
to the Far East through its Japanese joint venture, IMAT. During
the third quarter of 2000 the Company and its joint venture
partner, Matsubo, transferred IMATs activities and
employees to Matsubo, which became a distributor of the
Companys flat panel products, and shut down the operations
of IMAT.
Selling, general and administrative expense
totaled $6.7 million, $4.4 million and
$7.2 million in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively,
representing 13%, 12% and 17% of net revenue. The increase from
2000 to 2001 was primarily due to a $1.5 million credit to
bad debt expense recognized in 2000. The primary reasons for the
decrease from 1999 to 2000 were the $1.5 million credit to
bad debt expense and a $1.2 million reduction in expense
from 1999 related to elimination of the electron beam processing
equipment product line.
Restructuring and other expense (gain).
Restructuring and other expense (gain)
was ($0.6) million and $3.1 million in 2000 and 1999,
respectively.
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company
adopted a plan to discontinue operations at its RPC
Technologies, Inc. electron beam processing equipment subsidiary
and to close RPCs facility in Hayward, California and
incurred a charge of $1.6 million in 1999 related to this
plan. The employment of 26 employees was terminated as a
result. In the first quarter of 2000, Intevac sold certain
assets of the RPC Technologies, Inc. subsidiary to Quemex
Technology. Proceeds from the sale included a cash payment,
assumption of the Hayward facility lease and the assumption of
certain other liabilities. Excluded from the sale were two
previously leased systems and three completed systems remaining
in inventory. The Company was able to reverse the portions of
the restructuring reserve established to provide for future
rents due on the facility and for the closure of the facility.
However, since Intevac retained ownership of the two leased
systems, the Company established an equivalent reserve to
provide for any residual value at the end of the leases.
During the third quarter of 1999, the Company
adopted an expense reduction plan that included closing one of
the buildings at its Santa Clara facility and a reduction in
force of 7 employees. The Company incurred a charge of
$2.2 million in 1999 related to the expense reduction plan.
In the fourth quarter of 1999, $0.1 million of the
restructuring reserve was reversed due to lower than expected
costs on the closure of the facility. During the first quarter
of 2000, the Company vacated the building and negotiated a lease
termination for that space with its landlord, which released the
Company from the obligation to pay any rent after April 30,
2000. As a result, the Company reversed $0.6 million of the
restructuring reserve during the first quarter of 2000. During
the third quarter of 2000, the Company completed all activities
related to closing the vacated portion of the building and
reversed the remaining $23,000 of the restructuring reserve.
20
During the first quarter of 1999, the Company
implemented a reduction in force of 27 employees and
incurred a charge of $0.1 million related to severance
costs for the affected employees.
Interest expense.
Interest expense consists primarily of
interest on the Convertible Notes issued in the first quarter of
1997, and, to a lesser extent, interest on approximately
$2.0 million of long-term debt related to the purchase of
Cathode Technology in 1996. Interest expense totaled
$2.9 million, $3.0 million and $3.7 million in
2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. The decline in interest
expense was primarily the result of the repurchase by Intevac of
$3.7 million and $16.3 million of the Convertible
Notes during 2001 and 1999, respectively, and, to a lesser
extent, the repayment of the Cathode Technology debt in January
2001.
Interest income and other, net.
Interest income and other, net totaled
$1.1 million, $3.1 million and $3.6 million in
2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Interest income and other,
net in 2001 consisted of $1.2 million of interest income on
investments, $0.4 million of dividends on Intevacs
interest in 601 California Avenue LLC, a $0.8 million loss
on the disposition of Pacific Gas and Electric commercial paper
and $0.3 million of early payment discounts and other
income. Interest income and other, net in 2000 consisted of
$2.3 million of interest income on investments,
$0.4 million of dividends on Intevacs interest in 601
California Avenue LLC, $0.2 million of gains on foreign
currency forward contracts and $0.2 million of early
payment discounts and other income. Interest income and other,
net in 1999 consisted of $2.1 million of interest income on
Intevacs investments, $1.1 million of dividends on
Intevacs interest in 601 California Avenue LLC, and
$0.5 million of gains on foreign currency forward contracts.
6 1/2% Convertible Subordinated Notes Due
2004.
In 2001, Intevac repurchased
$3.7 million of its Convertible Notes and recognized a gain
of $0.8 million, net of applicable taxes. In 1999, Intevac
repurchased $16.3 million of its Convertible Notes from
which it recognized a gain of $3.8 million, net of
applicable taxes.
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes.
In 2001, the Company recorded
$5.0 million of income tax expense to provide additional
valuation allowance against deferred tax assets. The
Companys net deferred tax assets totaled zero at
December 31, 2001 net of a $16.9 million valuation
allowance.
Intevacs estimated effective tax rate for
2000 was 0%. The Company did not accrue a tax benefit during
2000 due to the inability to realize additional refunds from
loss carry-backs. The Companys net deferred tax assets
totaled $7.7 million at December 31, 2000, net of a
$3.6 million valuation allowance established due to the
uncertainty of realizing certain tax credits and loss
carry-forwards.
For the year ended December 31, 1999,
Intevac recorded an $8.3 million tax benefit provision,
computed at a 38% annual tax rate, on a pretax loss from
continuing operations of $22.0 million. Intevacs 1999
effective tax rate differed from the applicable statutory rates
primarily due to benefits from tax-exempt interest income, which
were partially offset by nondeductible goodwill amortization.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Operating activities in 2001 used cash of
$11.7 million, primarily due to the net loss incurred,
which was partially offset by depreciation, amortization and an
increase in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets.
Investing activities in 2001 provided cash of $28.9 million
as a result of the net sale of investments, which was partially
offset by the purchase of property and equipment. Financing
activities in 2001 used cash of $3.7 million due to the
repurchase of a portion of the Convertible Notes and the
repayment of the Cathode Technology debt, partially offset by
the sale of Intevacs stock to employees under its stock
option and employee stock purchase plans.
At December 31, 2001, Intevac had
$18.2 million of cash and cash equivalents. Intevac intends
to undertake approximately $4.0 million in capital
expenditures during the next 12 months and believes the
existing cash and cash equivalent balances will be sufficient to
meet its cash requirements for the next twelve months.
Intevac has incurred operating losses each year
since 1998 and the Company cannot predict with certainty when it
will return to profitability. We anticipate generating positive
cash flow during the 2002 fiscal year, but that is dependent on
continued growth in the business and our continued ability to
obtain advances
21
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk
Interest rate risk.
The table below presents principal
amounts and related weighted-average interest rates by year of
maturity for the Companys debt obligations.
Fair
2002
2003
2004
2005
2006
Beyond
Total
Value
(Dollars in thousands)
$
37,545
$
37,545
$
20,087
6.50
%
6.50
%
6.50
%
Foreign exchange risk. From time to time, the Company enters into foreign currency forward exchange contracts to hedge anticipated foreign currency transaction, translation and re-measurement exposures. The objective of these contracts is to minimize the impact of foreign currency exchange rate movements on the Companys operating results. At December 31, 2001, the Company did not have any foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
22
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
INTEVAC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
CONTENTS
Page | ||||
|
||||
Report of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Auditors
|
24 | |||
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent
Auditors
|
25 | |||
Consolidated Balance Sheets
|
26 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss
|
27 | |||
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders
Equity
|
28 | |||
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
29 | |||
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
30 |
23
REPORT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
balance sheets of Intevac, Inc. as of December 31, 2001 and
2000 and the related consolidated statements of operations and
comprehensive loss, shareholders equity and cash flows for
each of the two years in the period ended December 31,
2001. Our audits also included the 2000 and 2001 data in the
financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of
America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the
audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits
provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated financial position of Intevac, Inc.
at December 31, 2001 and 2000, and the consolidated results
of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years
in the period ended December 31, 2001, in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America. Also, in our opinion, the 2000 and 2001 data in the
related financial statement schedule, when considered in
relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole,
presents fairly in all material respects the information set
forth therein.
San Jose, California
24
GRANT THORNTON LLP
Table of Contents
REPORT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
The Board of Directors and Shareholders
We have audited the accompanying consolidated
statements of operations and comprehensive loss,
shareholders equity and cash flows for the year ended
December 31, 1999. Our audit also included the 1999 data in
the financial statement schedule listed in the Index at
Item 14(a). These financial statements and schedule are the
responsibility of the Companys management. Our
responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial
statements and schedule based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with
auditing standards generally accepted in the United States.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatements. An audit includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and
disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes
assessing the accounting principles used and significant
estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit
provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the consolidated financial
statements referred to above present fairly, in all material
respects, the consolidated results of operations of Intevac,
Inc. and its cash flows for the year ended December 31,
1999, in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States. Also, in our opinion, the 1999
data in the related financial statement schedule, when
considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken
as a whole, presents fairly in all material respects the
information set forth therein.
San Jose, California
25
ERNST & YOUNG LLP
Table of Contents
INTEVAC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
December 31,
2001
2000
ASSETS
$
18,157
$
4,616
33,787
8,046
9,593
21,691
15,833
478
844
1,307
48,372
65,980
5,873
5,705
21,096
19,836
26,969
25,541
18,105
14,481
8,864
11,060
2,431
2,431
7
495
774
3
3,684
$
60,165
$
83,936
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
$
242
$
814
1,904
2,386
1,943
1,573
1,534
3,547
2,375
13,464
16,317
21,212
24,887
37,545
41,245
19,093
18,675
122
(17,807
)
(871
)
1,408
17,804
$
60,165
$
83,936
See accompanying notes.
26
INTEVAC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
51,484
$
36,049
$
42,962
41,729
34,059
40,410
9,755
1,990
2,552
14,478
10,576
14,136
6,745
4,415
7,226
(638
)
3,069
21,223
14,353
24,431
(11,468
)
(12,363
)
(21,879
)
(2,912
)
(3,033
)
(3,711
)
1,245
2,341
2,100
(180
)
731
1,532
(13,315
)
(12,324
)
(21,958
)
4,424
(8,344
)
(17,739
)
(12,324
)
(13,614
)
803
3,844
$
(16,936
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
122
122
$
(16,814
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
$
(1.48
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(1.16
)
$
(1.42
)
$
(1.04
)
$
(0.83
)
11,955
11,803
11,777
See accompanying notes.
27
INTEVAC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF SHAREHOLDERS
EQUITY
Accumulated
Retained
Common Stock
Other
Earnings
Total
Comprehensive
(Accum.
Shareholders
Shares
Amount
Income
Deficit)
Equity
11,887
$
17,917
$
122
$
22,397
$
40,436
27
38
38
122
684
684
(321
)
(491
)
(1,174
)
(1,665
)
22
22
(122
)
(122
)
(9,770
)
(9,770
)
11,715
$
18,170
$
$
11,453
$
29,623
20
58
58
109
418
418
29
29
(12,324
)
(12,324
)
11,844
$
18,675
$
$
(871
)
$
17,804
41
13
13
119
405
405
122
122
(16,936
)
(16,936
)
12,004
$
19,093
$
122
$
(17,807
)
$
1,408
See accompanying notes.
28
INTEVAC, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS
Years Ending December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
(17,739
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(13,614
)
803
3,844
(16,936
)
(12,324
)
(9,770
)
3,916
3,721
3,805
4,988
2,734
251
2,342
1,578
(1,408
)
(6,199
)
125
(39
)
856
428
803
8
2
336
1,547
1,614
(1,038
)
(3,536
)
(343
)
4,147
366
(332
)
586
443
929
(1,020
)
639
(5,768
)
1,287
(2,853
)
6,466
(1,779
)
5,164
12,346
2,092
(11,772
)
22
(7,678
)
(5,463
)
(116,271
)
(50,880
)
38,447
120,084
70,205
(4,050
)
(2,990
)
(1,736
)
28,934
823
17,589
418
476
722
(1,665
)
(2,257
)
(9,664
)
(1,904
)
(3,743
)
476
(10,607
)
122
13,541
1,321
(696
)
4,616
3,295
3,991
$
18,157
$
4,616
$
3,295
$
2,715
$
2,789
$
3,555
2
2
(5,803
)
(3,099
)
$
(2,322
)
$
304
$
1,942
29
22
See accompanying notes.
29
INTEVAC, INC.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS
1. Business and
Nature of Operations
Intevac, Inc.s businesses are the design,
manufacture and sale of complex capital equipment used to
manufacture products such as flat panel displays and thin-film
disks (Equipment) and the development of highly
sensitive electro-optical devices and systems
(Photonics).
Systems sold by the Equipment Division are
typically used to deposit highly engineered thin-films of
material on a substrate, or to modify the characteristics and
properties of thin-films already deposited on a substrate.
Systems manufactured by the Equipment Division generally utilize
proprietary manufacturing techniques and processes and operate
under high levels of vacuum. The systems are designed for
high-volume continuous operation and use precision robotics,
computerized controls and complex software programs to fully
automate and control the production process. Products
manufactured with these systems include color cell phone
displays, automotive displays, computer monitors and disks for
computer hard disk drives. The Equipment Division has also
designed ultra high vacuum automated equipment for Photonics to
be used for the future manufacture of low-cost low-light-level
cameras.
The Photonics Division is developing
electro-optical devices and systems that permit highly sensitive
detection of photons in the visible and short wave infrared
portions of the spectrum. This development work is aimed at
creating new products for both military and industrial
applications. Products include LIVAR systems for positive target
identification at long range, low-cost low-light-level cameras
for use in security and military applications and photodiodes
for use in high-speed fiber optic systems.
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company
adopted a plan to discontinue its electron beam processing
equipment product line and to close the facility in Hayward,
California where that equipment was built.
2. Summary of
Significant Accounting Policies
The consolidated financial statements include the
accounts of Intevac and its wholly owned subsidiaries. All
inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated.
Intevac recognizes revenue using the guidance
from SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 101 Revenue
Recognition in Financial Statements. Intevacs
revenue recognition policy requires that there be persuasive
evidence of a sales contract, that the price is fixed, that
title has transferred, that product payment is not contingent on
any factors and is reasonably assured, and that the Company has
completed all the material tasks and deliverables required by
the contract.
Systems and
components
Revenues for
systems are recognized upon customer acceptance. For large
deposition and RTP systems shipped through a distributor,
revenue is typically recognized after the distributor has
accepted the system at Intevacs factory and the system has
been shipped. For large deposition and RTP systems sold direct
to end customers, revenue is recognized after installation and
acceptance of the system at the customer site. When the Company
believes that there may be higher than normal end user
installation and acceptance issues for systems shipped through a
distributor, such as when the first unit of a newly designed
system is delivered, then the Company defers revenue recognition
until the distributors customer has also accepted the
system. Revenues for technology upgrades, spare parts,
consumable and prototype products built by the Photonics
Division are generally recognized upon shipment.
Service and
Maintenance
Service and
maintenance contract revenue, which to date has been
insignificant, is recognized ratably over applicable contract
periods or as services are performed.
30
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Technology
Development
The Company
performs best efforts research and development work under
various research contracts. Revenue on these contracts is
recognized in accordance with contract terms, typically as costs
are incurred. Typically, for each contract, the Company commits
to perform certain research and development efforts up to an
agreed upon amount. In connection with these contracts, the
Company receives funding on an incremental basis up to a
ceiling. Upon completion of each contract, each party will
typically receive certain rights to the technical and computer
software data developed under the contract. Some of these
contracts are cost sharing in nature, where Intevac is
reimbursed for a portion of the total costs expended. In
addition, the Company has, from time to time, negotiated with a
third party to fund a portion of the Companys costs in
return for a joint interest to the Companys rights at the
end of the contract. In the event a particular contract
over-runs its agreed upon amount, the Company may be liable for
the additional costs.
Net revenues and related cost of net revenues
associated with these contracts were $7,885,000 and $9,782,000,
respectively for 2001, $5,975,000 and $7,090,000, respectively
for 2000, and $7,067,000 and $7,071,000, respectively for 1999.
The Companys standard warranty is twelve
months from customer acceptance. During this warranty period any
necessary non-consumable parts are supplied and installed. A
provision for the estimated warranty cost is recorded upon
customer acceptance for systems and upon shipment for non-system
products.
The Company makes payments to agents and
representatives under agreements related to international sales
in return for obtaining orders and providing installation and
warranty services. These payments to agents and representatives
are included in selling, general and administrative expenses.
These amounts totaled approximately $141,000, $0 and $0 for the
years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Customer advances generally represent
nonrefundable deposits invoiced by the Company in connection
with receiving customer purchase orders and other events
preceding acceptance of systems. Customer advances related to
products that have not been shipped to customers, and included
in accounts receivable were $857,000 and $2,719,000 at
December 31, 2001 and 2000, respectively.
The Company considers all highly liquid
investments with a maturity of three months or less when
purchased to be cash equivalents.
Short-term investments consist principally of
highly rated debt instruments with maturities generally between
one and twelve months and are carried at fair value. These
investments are typically short-term in nature and therefore
bear minimal risk.
Management determines the appropriate
classification of debt securities at the time of purchase and
reevaluates such designation as of each balance sheet date. At
December 31, 2000, all debt securities were classified as
available-for-sale under Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 115 Accounting for Certain Investments
in Debt and Equity Securities. Securities classified as
available-for-sale are reported at fair market value with the
related unrealized gains and losses included in retained
earnings. Realized gains and losses and declines in value judged
to be other-than-temporary on available-for-sale securities are
included in other income and expenses. The cost of securities
sold is based on the specific identification method.
31
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
Cash and cash equivalents represent cash accounts
and money market funds. Short-term investments of $33,787,000 at
December 31, 2000 consisted primarily of investments in
commercial paper and market auction rate bonds. Fair values are
based on quoted market prices. The amount of unrealized gain or
loss was not significant at December 31, 2000 and 1999.
Gross realized gains and losses for the years ended
December 31, 2000 and 1999 were not significant.
We assess the impairment of identifiable
intangibles, long-lived assets and goodwill whenever events or
changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may
not be recoverable. Factors we consider important which could
trigger an impairment review include the following:
When we determine that the carrying value of
long-lived assets, intangibles or goodwill may not be
recoverable based upon the existence of one or more of the above
indicators of impairment, we measure any impairment based on a
projected discounted cash flow method using a discount rate
determined by our management to be commensurate with the risk
inherent in our current business model. In 2000, the Company
determined that the intangible assets related to the purchase of
Cathode Technology Corporation (Cathode) and Lotus
Technologies, Inc. had become impaired. At December 31,
2000 the remaining goodwill related to those purchases,
amounting to $1,056,000, was written off.
The Company may enter into foreign currency
forward exchange contracts to hedge certain of its foreign
currency transaction, translation and re-measurement exposures.
The Companys accounting policies for some of these
instruments are based on the Companys designation of such
instruments as hedging transactions. Instruments not designated
as a hedge transaction will be marked to market at
the end of each accounting period. The criteria the Company uses
for designating an instrument as a hedge include effectiveness
in exposure reduction and one-to-one matching of the derivative
financial instrument to the underlying transaction being hedged.
Gains and losses on foreign currency forward exchange contracts
that are designated and effective as hedges of existing
transactions are recognized in income in the same period as
losses and gains on the underlying transactions are recognized
and generally offset.
During fiscal 2000 and 1999, the Company entered
into yen denominated foreign currency forward exchange contracts
to hedge anticipated yen denominated sales. The Company did not
designate these foreign currency forward contracts as hedge
transactions; therefore, the contracts were marked to
market. As of December 31, 2001, the Company had no
foreign currency forward exchange contracts outstanding. In
fiscal 2000 the Company realized gains of $111,000 related to
foreign currency forward exchange contracts, and in fiscal 1999
the Company recorded transaction losses of $251,000 related to
foreign currency forward exchange contracts.
While the notional amounts of foreign exchange
contracts are often used to express the volume of these
transactions, the potential accounting loss on these
transactions if all counterparties failed to perform is limited
32
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
to the amounts, if any, by which the
counterparties obligations exceed the Companys
obligation to the counterparties.
The carrying amount of the short-term financial
instruments (cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments,
accounts receivable and certain other liabilities) approximates
fair value due to the short-term maturity of those instruments.
Based on the quoted market prices for the same or similar issues
or on the current rates offered for debt of the same remaining
maturities, the fair value of the $37.5 million of
outstanding Convertible Notes as of December 31, 2001 is
$20.1 million.
Inventories for systems and components are stated
at the lower of standard cost or market. Inventories consist of
the following:
Intevac makes provisions for potentially excess
and obsolete inventory based on backlog and forecasted demand.
However, order backlog is subject to revisions, cancellations,
and rescheduling. Actual demand will inevitably differ from
forecasted demand due to a number of factors. For example, the
thin-film disk industry has suffered from over capacity and poor
financial results, which has led to industry consolidation.
Consolidation can lead to the availability of used equipment
that competes at very low prices with the Companys
products. Financial stress and consolidation in the
Companys customer base can also lead to the cancellation
of orders for products after the Company has incurred
substantial costs related to those orders. Such problems have
resulted, and may continue to result, in excess and obsolete
inventory, and the provision of related reserves. Inventory
reserves included in the above table were $12.7 million at
December 31, 2001 and $8.7 million at
December 31, 2000.
Equipment and leasehold improvements are carried
at cost less allowances for accumulated depreciation and
amortization. Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in
the consolidated statements of operations.
Depreciation for machinery and equipment is
computed using the straight-line method over the estimated
useful lives of the assets, which are generally three to seven
years. Amortization of leasehold improvements is computed using
the shorter of the remaining terms of the leases or the
estimated economic useful lives of the improvements.
The Company amortizes intangible assets on a
straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, which range
from two to seven years.
33
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
SFAS No. 130, Reporting Comprehensive
Income requires unrealized gains or losses on the
Companys available-for-sale securities and the foreign
currency translation adjustments, which prior to the adoption
were reported separately in shareholders equity, to be
included in other comprehensive income. As of December 31,
2001, the $122,000 balance of accumulated other comprehensive
income is comprised entirely of accumulated foreign currency
translation adjustments. There was no accumulated other
comprehensive income as of December 31, 2000 or 1999.
The Company accounts for its stock option plans
and its employee stock purchase plan in accordance with
provisions of the Accounting Principles Boards Opinion
No. 25 (APB 25), Accounting For
Stock Issued to Employees. SFAS 123, Accounting
for Stock Based Compensation provides a fair value-based
alternative to APB 25. The Company is continuing to account
for its employee stock plans in accordance with the provisions
of APB 25. Under APB 25, because the exercise prices
of the Companys stock options granted to employees equal
the market prices of the underlying stock on the date of grant,
no compensation expense is recognized.
Certain prior year amounts in the Consolidated
Financial Statements have been reclassified to conform to 2001
presentation.
34
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of
basic and diluted loss per share:
The preparation of financial statements in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America requires management to make estimates
and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts
of revenue and expenses during the reporting period. Actual
results inevitably will differ from those estimates, and such
differences may be material to the financial statements.
In June 2001, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 141,
Business Combinations. Under SFAS 141, all
business
35
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
combinations are to be accounted for using the
purchase method. SFAS 141 is effective for all business
combinations initiated after June 30, 2001.
In August 2001, the FASB issued SFAS
No. 144, Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of
Long-Lived Assets. SFAS 144 requires that one
accounting model be used for long-lived assets to be disposed of
by sale, whether previously held and used or newly acquired.
SFAS 144 is effective for financial statements issued for
fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2001, and interim
periods within those fiscal years. The Company believes that the
adoption of SFAS 144 will not have a material effect on its
consolidated financial statements.
3. Concentrations
Financial instruments that potentially subject
the Company to significant concentrations of credit risk consist
of cash equivalents, short-term investments, accounts receivable
and foreign exchange forward contracts. The Company generally
invests its excess cash in money market funds and in commercial
paper, which have contracted maturities generally within one
year. By policy, the Companys investments in commercial
paper, certificates of deposit, Eurodollar time deposits, or
bankers acceptances are rated A1/P1 or better. In 2001,
the Company recorded a loss of $803,000 on its investment in
commercial paper issued by Pacific Gas & Electric.
The Companys largest customers tend to
change from period to period as a function of each
customers plans to renovate, or expand production
capacity. Historically, a significant portion of the
Companys revenues in any particular period have been
attributable to sales to a limited number of customers. In 2001,
one customer accounted for 49% of the Companys
consolidated net revenues. In 2000, four customers accounted for
17%, 16%, 12% and 11%, respectively, of the Companys
consolidated revenues and in aggregate accounted for 56% of net
revenues. In 1999 three customers accounted for 34%, 21% and
11%, respectively, of the Companys consolidated revenues
and in aggregate accounted for 66% of net revenues. The Company
performs credit evaluations of its customers financial
conditions and requires deposits on system orders but does not
generally require collateral or other security to support
customer receivables.
Flat panel and disk manufacturing equipment
together contributed a significant portion of the Companys
revenues in 2001, while disk manufacturing equipment alone
contributed a significant portion of the Companys revenues
in 2000 and 1999. The Company expects that its ability to
maintain or expand its current levels of revenues and to return
to profitability in the future will depend upon its success in
enhancing its existing systems and developing and manufacturing
competitive flat panel and disk manufacturing equipment and its
success in developing other products such as photonics devices
and systems.
4. Equity
Investments
In 1995, the Company entered into a Limited
Liability Company Operating Agreement (the Operating
Agreement), which expires December 31, 2015, with
601 California Avenue LLC (the LLC), a
California limited liability company formed and owned by the
Company and certain shareholders of the Company at that time.
Under the Operating Agreement, the Company transferred its
leasehold interest in the site of the Companys
discontinued night vision business (the Site) in
exchange for a preferred share in the LLC with a face value of
$3,900,000. The Company is accounting for the investment under
the cost method and has recorded its investment in the LLC at
$2,431,000, which represents the Companys historical
carrying value of
36
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
the leasehold interest in the Site. The preferred
share in the LLC pays a 10% annual cumulative preferred dividend.
During 1996, the LLC formed a joint venture with
Stanford University (the Stanford JV) to develop the
property. The project was completed and leased in August 1998.
The Company received dividends of $390,000, $390,000 and
$1,077,000 from the LLC in 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively.
The dividends received during 1999 consisted of the annual
$390,000 dividend plus the cumulative dividends earned in prior
years. As of December 31, 2001 all outstanding cumulative
dividends on the preferred share had been paid. These dividends
are included in other income and expense.
On June 27, 1997, the Company entered into
an agreement with Matsubo to form a joint venture responsible
for the sales and service of Intevacs flat panel display
equipment in Japan and other Asian countries. The Company
invested $436,000 for 49% of the voting stock of the joint
venture. The joint venture was accounted for by the equity
method. Gains and losses related to the Companys share of
the joint venture were reflected in other income and expense,
net on the consolidated statements of income. The Companys
equity in the net income or (loss) of IMAT, Inc. was
($125,000) and $15,000 in 2000 and 1999, respectively. During
the third quarter of 2000, the Company and its joint venture
partner, Matsubo, transferred IMATs activities and
employees to Matsubo and terminated the operations of IMAT.
5. Commitments
The Company leases certain facilities under
non-cancelable operating leases that expire at various times up
to 2007. The facility leases require the Company to pay for all
normal maintenance costs. The lease for the primary facility in
Santa Clara includes an option to extend the lease for an
additional five-year period.
Future minimum rental payments under these leases
at December 31, 2001 are as follows (in thousands):
Gross rental expense was approximately
$2,993,000, $1,596,000 and $2,652,000 for the years ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999, respectively. Offsetting
rental expense for the periods ending December 31, 2000 and
1999 was sublease income of $62,000 and $238,000, respectively.
6. Employee
Benefit Plan
In 1991, the Company established a defined
contribution retirement plan with 401(k) plan features. The plan
covers all United States employees eighteen years and older.
Employees may make contributions by a percentage reduction in
their salaries, not to exceed the statutorily prescribed annual
limit. The Company made cash contributions of $301,000, $123,000
and $170,000 for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. Employees may choose among eleven
investment options for their contributions and their share of
the Company contributions, and they are able to move funds
between investment options at any time. Administrative expenses
relating to the plan are insignificant.
37
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
7. Notes
Payable
In 1996, the Company issued notes related to the
purchase of Cathode. The notes bore interest at 5.58% compounded
monthly and payable quarterly. Principal payments on the note
were made quarterly based on unit sales of the Cathode sputter
sources. The remaining balance on the notes was paid in full in
January 2001.
8. Convertible
Notes
During the first quarter of 1997, the Company
completed an offering of $57.5 million of its 6 1/2%
Convertible Subordinated Notes (the Convertible
Notes), which mature March 1, 2004. Interest is
payable each March 1st and September 1st. The notes are
convertible into shares of the Companys common stock at
$20.625 per share. Expenses associated with the offering of
approximately $2.3 million were deferred. Such expenses are
being amortized to interest expense over the term of the notes.
During 2001, the Company repurchased $3,700,000,
face value, of its Convertible Notes. The repurchase resulted in
a gain of $803,000 (net of income taxes). During 1999, the
Company repurchased $16,255,000, face value, of its Convertible
Notes. The repurchase resulted in a gain of $3,844,000 (net of
income taxes).
9. Segment
Reporting
Intevac, Inc. has two reportable operating
segments: Equipment and Photonics. The Companys Equipment
Division sells complex capital equipment used in the
manufacturing of flat panel displays and thin-film disks. The
Companys Photonics Division is developing devices and
systems utilizing electron sources that permit highly sensitive
detection of photons in the visible and the short-wave infrared
spectrum.
Included in corporate activities are general
corporate expenses, the equity in net loss of equity investee
(see Note 4), amortization expenses related to certain
intangible assets and the reversal in 2000 of a portion of a
restructuring reserve established in September 1999, less an
allocation of corporate expenses to operating units equal to 1%
of net revenues. Assets of corporate activities include
unallocated cash and short-term investments, deferred income tax
assets (which were written off in 2001) and certain intangibles
and other assets.
The Company evaluates performance and allocates
resources based on profit or loss from operations before
interest, other income and expense and income taxes. The
accounting policies of the reportable segments are the same as
those described in the summary of significant accounting
policies.
38
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
39
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
10. Shareholders
Equity
The Companys Articles of Incorporation
authorize 10,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock. The Board of
Directors has the authority to issue the Preferred Stock in one
or more series and to fix the price, rights, preferences,
privileges and restrictions thereof, including dividend rights,
dividend rates, conversion rights, voting rights, terms of
redemption, redemption prices, liquidation preferences and the
number of shares constituting any series or the designation of
such series, without further vote or action by the shareholders.
The Board of Directors approved the 1991 Stock
Option/ Stock Issuance Plan (the 1991 Plan) in 1991.
The maximum number of shares that may be issued over the term of
the 1991 Plan is 2,666,667 shares.
The 1991 Plan is divided into two separate
components: the Option Grant Program and the Stock Issuance
Program. Under the Option Grant Program, the Company may grant
either incentive stock options or nonqualified options or
implement stock appreciation rights provisions at the discretion
of the Board of Directors. Exercisability, option price, and
other terms are determined by the Board of Directors, but the
option price shall not be less than 85% and 100% of the fair
market value for nonqualified options and incentive stock
options, respectively, as determined by the Board of Directors.
Options granted under the 1991 Plan are immediately exercisable;
however, unexercised options and shares purchased upon the
exercise of the options are subject to vesting over a five-year
period. The Company may repurchase shares that are not vested.
No shares were subject to repurchase at December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999.
In 1995, the Board of Directors approved adoption
of (i) the 1995 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan (the
1995 Plan) under which employees, non-employee
directors and consultants may be granted stock options to
purchase stock or issued shares of stock at not less than 85% of
fair market value on the grant/ issuance date; and (ii) the
Employee Stock Purchase Plan. The 1995 Plan, as amended in 2000,
serves as the successor equity incentive program to the
Companys 1991 Plan. Upon adoption of the 1995 Plan, all
shares available for issuance under the 1991 Plan were
transferred to the 1995 Plan. As of December 31, 2001,
2,079,251 shares of common stock are authorized for future
issuance under the 1995 Plan. Options granted under the 1995
Plan are exercisable upon vesting and generally vest over a
five-year period. Options currently expire no later than ten
years from the date of grant.
Options to purchase 1,062,742, 878,157 and
692,457 shares were vested at December 31, 2001, 2000 and
1999, respectively.
Pro forma information regarding net income and
earnings per share is required by SFAS 123, which also requires
that the information be determined as if the Company has
accounted for its employee stock options granted subsequent to
December 31, 1994 under the fair value method of this
Statement. The fair value for these options was estimated at the
date of grant using a Black-Scholes multiple option pricing
model with the following weighted average assumptions for 2001,
2000 and 1999, respectively: risk-free interest rates of
40
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
3.03%, 5.17% and 6.15%; dividend yields of 0.0%,
0.0% and 0.0%; volatility factors of the expected market price
of the Companys common stock of 0.946, 0.936 and 0.855;
and a weighted-average expected life of the option of 0.25, 0.25
and 0.25 years beyond each respective vesting period.
The Black-Scholes option valuation model was
developed for use in estimating the fair value of traded options
which have no vesting restrictions and are fully transferable.
In addition, option models require the input of highly
subjective assumptions including the expected stock price
volatility. Because the Companys employee stock options
have characteristics significantly different from those of
traded options, and because changes in the subjective
assumptions can materially affect the fair value estimate, in
managements opinion, the existing models do not
necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the fair value
of its employee stock options.
Under the 1995 Employee Stock Purchase Plan, as
amended in 1999, (the ESPP), the Company is
authorized to issue up to 1,000,000 shares of common stock to
participating employees. Under the terms of the ESPP, employees
can choose to have up to 10% of their annual base earnings
withheld to purchase the Companys common stock. The
purchase price of the stock is 85% of the lower of the
subscription date fair market value or the purchase date fair
market value. Approximately 70% of eligible employees have
participated in the ESPP. Under the ESPP, the Company sold
118,904, 108,784 and 122,325 shares to employees in 2001, 2000
and 1999, respectively. As of December 31, 2001, 293,696
shares remained reserved for issuance under the ESPP. The
Company does not recognize compensation cost related to employee
purchase rights under the Plan. To comply with the pro forma
reporting requirements of SFAS 123, compensation cost is
estimated for the fair value of the employees purchase
rights using the Black-Scholes model with the following
assumptions for those rights granted in 2001, 2000 and 1999,
respectively: risk-free interest rates of 1.93%, 5.36% and
5.78%; dividend yield of 0.0%, 0.0% and 0.0%; expected
volatility of 0.946, 0.936 and 0.855; and an expected life of
2.00, 2.00 and 1.99 years (the offering period ends
July 31, 2003 for the subscription period that began in
August 2001). The weighted average fair value of those purchase
rights granted in 2001, 2000 and 1999 were $2.47, $2.78 and
$2.94, respectively per share.
Had compensation cost for the Companys
stock-based compensation plans been determined based on the fair
value at the grant dates for awards under those plans consistent
with the method of SFAS 123, the Companys net loss
and earnings per share would have been reduced to the pro forma
amounts indicated below:
41
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
A summary of the Companys stock option
activity and related information for the years ended
December 31 follows:
Outstanding and Exercisable by Price Range as
of December 31, 2001
42
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
11. Income
Taxes
The provision for (benefit from) income taxes on
income from continuing operations consists of the following (in
thousands):
The tax benefits associated with exercises of
nonqualified stock options and disqualifying dispositions of
stock acquired through the incentive stock option and employee
stock purchase plans reduced taxes currently payable for 2001,
2000 and 1999 as shown above by $0, $29,000 and $22,000,
respectively. Such benefits were credited to additional paid-in
capital when realized.
Deferred income taxes reflect the net tax effects
of temporary differences between losses reported and the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial
reporting purposes and the amounts used for income tax purposes.
Significant components of the Companys deferred tax assets
computed in accordance with SFAS 109 are as follows (in
thousands):
43
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
The valuation allowance increased by $10,551,000
and $3,605,000 during 2001 and 2000, respectively, due to the
uncertainty of realizing certain tax credit and loss
carry-forwards, and other deferred tax assets. The Federal and
State NOL carry-forwards of $17,831,000 and $7,607,000 expire at
various dates through 2021 and 2011, respectively, if not
previously utilized. The AMT credit carry-forwards do not expire.
A reconciliation of the income tax provision on
income from continuing operations at the federal statutory rate
of 35% to the income tax provision at the effective tax rate is
as follows (in thousands):
12. Research and
Development Cost Sharing Agreements
The Company entered into an agreement with a
Japanese company to perform best efforts joint research and
development work. The nature of the project is to develop a
glass-coating machine to be used in the production of flat panel
displays. The Company was funded for one-half of the actual
costs of the project up to a ceiling of $9,450,000. At
December 31, 1999, the Company had received the entire
amount under the contract. Qualifying costs of approximately
$3,108,000 and $1,467,000 for the years ended December 31,
2000 and 1999, respectively, were incurred on this project,
resulting in offsets against research and development costs of
approximately $583,000 and $736,000 in 2000 and 1999,
respectively. As of December 31, 2000, the entire advance
had been applied to qualifying costs.
Upon completion of the research and development
work, if successful, each party will receive certain
manufacturing and marketing rights for separate regions of the
world. The agreement also calls for certain royalty payments by
each party to the other party, based on production and sales.
The royalty rate will be 5% for each party.
13. Restructuring
and Other
During the fourth quarter of 1999, the Company
adopted a plan to discontinue operations at its RPC
Technologies, Inc. electron beam processing equipment subsidiary
and to close RPCs facility in Hayward, California and
incurred a charge of $1,639,000 in 1999 related to this plan.
The employment of 26 employees was terminated. The
significant components of this charge included $679,000 for
inventory write-downs which were charged to cost of sales,
$264,000 for fixed asset write-offs, $200,000 for closure of the
facility, $163,000 for employee severance costs, $161,000 for
future rent due on the facility and $152,000 for write-off of
intangibles. In the first quarter of 2000, Intevac sold certain
assets of the RPC Technologies, Inc. subsidiary to Quemex
Technology. Proceeds from the sale included a cash payment,
assumption of the Hayward facility lease and the assumption of
certain other liabilities. Excluded from the sale were two
previously leased systems and three completed systems remaining
in inventory. The Company was able to reverse the portions of
the restructuring reserve established to provide for future
rents due on the facility and for the closure of the facility.
However, since Intevac retained ownership of the two leased
systems, the Company established an equivalent reserve to
provide for any residual value at the end of the leases. Of the
three systems in inventory,
44
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
two were included in 2000 revenues and one is
included in 2001 revenues. One of the two leased systems was
sold to the lessee in 2001.
During the third quarter of 1999, the Company
adopted an expense reduction plan that included closing one of
the buildings at its Santa Clara facility and a reduction in
force of 7 employees. The Company incurred a charge of
$2,225,000 in 1999 related to the expense reduction plan. The
significant components of this charge included $873,000 for
future rent due on the building (net of expected sublease
income), $160,000 for costs associated with operating the
building through May 2000 and $1,192,000 for the write-off of
leasehold improvements and other costs associated with
restructuring. In the fourth quarter of 1999, $97,000 of the
restructuring reserve was reversed due to lower than expected
costs on the closure of the facility. During the first quarter
of 2000, the Company vacated the building and negotiated a lease
termination for that space with its landlord, which released the
Company from the obligation to pay any rent after April 30,
2000. As a result, the Company reversed $615,000 of the
restructuring reserve during the first quarter of 2000. During
the third quarter of 2000, the Company completed all activities
related to closing the building. As a result, the Company
reversed the remaining $23,000 of the restructuring reserve
during the third quarter of 2000.
During the first quarter of 1999, the Company
implemented a reduction in force of 17 employees. The reductions
took place at the Companys facilities in Santa Clara,
California. The Company incurred a charge of $115,000 in 1999
related to severance costs for the affected employees. As of
December 31, 1999, all of the severance had been paid.
The following table displays the activity in the
building closure restructuring reserve, established in the third
quarter of 1999, and in the RPC operation discontinuance
restructuring reserve, established in the fourth quarter of
1999, through December 31, 2000.
45
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS (Continued)
14. Other Accrued
Liabilities
15. Quarterly
Consolidated Results of Operations (Unaudited)
46
Basis of Presentation
Revenue Recognition
Table of Contents
Warranty
International Distribution Costs
Customer Advances
Cash, Cash Equivalents and Short-term
Investments
Table of Contents
Valuation of Long-lived and Intangible Assets
and Goodwill
significant underperformance relative to expected
historical or projected future operating results;
significant changes in the manner of our use of
the acquired assets or the strategy for our overall business;
significant negative industry or economic trends;
significant decline in our stock price for a
sustained period; and
our market capitalization relative to net book
value.
Foreign Exchange Contracts
Table of Contents
Financial Instruments
Inventories
December 31,
2001
2000
(In thousands)
$
5,659
$
4,591
11,962
8,209
4,070
3,033
$
21,691
$
15,833
Property, Plant and Equipment
Intangible Assets
Table of Contents
Comprehensive Income
Employee Stock Plans
Financial Presentation
Table of Contents
Net loss Per Share
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
(17,739
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(13,614
)
803
3,844
$
(16,936
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
$
(16,936
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
$
(16,936
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(9,770
)
11,955
11,803
11,777
11,955
11,803
11,777
(1)
Diluted EPS for the twelve-month periods ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 excludes as
converted treatment of the Convertible Notes as their
inclusion would be anti-dilutive. The number of as
converted shares excluded from the twelve-month periods
ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 was 1,954,910,
1,999,758 and 2,345,273, respectively
(2)
Diluted EPS for the twelve-month periods ended
December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999 excludes the effect of
employee stock options as their inclusion would be
anti-dilutive. The number of employee stock options excluded
from the twelve-month periods ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999 was 114,017, 156,504 and 169,564, respectively
Use of Estimates
New Accounting Pronouncements
Table of Contents
Credit Risk and Significant
Customers
Products
601 California Avenue LLC
Table of Contents
IMAT Inc.
$
2,634
2,953
3,070
3,192
3,318
838
$
16,005
Table of Contents
Segment Description
Segment Profit or Loss and Segment
Assets
Business Segment Net Revenues
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
42,723
$
28,797
$
36,008
8,761
7,252
6,954
$
51,484
$
36,049
$
42,962
Table of Contents
Business Segment Profit & Loss
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
(7,234
)
$
(8,048
)
$
(16,667
)
(2,595
)
(2,164
)
(935
)
(1,639
)
(2,151
)
(4,277
)
(11,468
)
(12,363
)
(21,879
)
(2,912
)
(3,033
)
(3,711
)
1,245
2,341
2,100
(180
)
731
1,532
$
(13,315
)
$
(12,324
)
$
(21,958
)
(1)
Includes restructuring and other charge of $1,639
in 1999.
(2)
Includes restructuring and other charge of $2,128
in 1999.
Business Segment Assets
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
31,843
$
32,207
$
29,871
7,253
4,404
4,483
21,069
47,325
60,028
$
60,165
$
83,936
$
94,382
Business Segment Property, Plant &
Equipment
Additions
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
692
$
2,237
$
4,230
3,010
656
794
348
401
278
$
4,050
$
3,294
$
5,302
(1)
Includes inventory transferred to fixed assets of
$304 and $1,942 in 2000 and 1999, respectively.
Depreciation
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
2,559
$
2,387
$
2,808
799
716
512
558
618
485
$
3,916
$
3,721
$
3,805
Table of Contents
Geographic Area Net Trade Revenues
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands)
$
14,154
$
26,466
$
17,254
36,363
9,414
25,372
827
49
234
140
120
102
$
51,484
$
36,049
$
42,962
Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plans
Table of Contents
2001
2000
1999
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
(18,634
)
$
(13,143
)
$
(14,871
)
$
(17,831
)
$
(13,143
)
$
(11,027
)
$
(1.56
)
$
(1.11
)
$
(1.26
)
$
(1.49
)
$
(1.11
)
$
(0.94
)
Table of Contents
2001
2000
1999
Weighted-Average
Weighted-Average
Weighted-Average
Options
Exercise Price
Options
Exercise Price
Options
Exercise Price
1,570,297
$
5.39
1,496,370
$
5.82
1,599,762
$
6.92
341,900
3.90
336,100
3.75
399,100
4.70
(41,149
)
0.30
(20,261
)
2.86
(26,497
)
1.45
(66,526
)
5.23
(241,912
)
5.99
(475,995
)
8.82
1,804,522
5.23
1,570,297
5.39
1,496,370
5.82
1,062,742
$
5.88
878,157
$
5.84
797,470
$
5.81
$
1.93
$
2.20
$
2.64
Options Outstanding
Options Exercisable
Number
Weighted Average
Weighted
Number
Weighted
Range of
Outstanding As of
Remaining
Average
Exercisable As of
Average
Exercise Prices
December 31, 2001
Contractual Life
Exercise Price
December 31, 2001
Exercise Price
101,312
3.40 yrs
$
2.02
96,112
$
1.97
206,400
9.80 yrs
$
3.20
500
$
3.20
220,000
8.47 yrs
$
3.38
60,000
$
3.38
191,950
8.14 yrs
$
3.85
68,070
$
3.84
260,300
8.41 yrs
$
5.13
131,000
$
5.16
353,161
3.61 yrs
$
6.00
353,161
$
6.00
189,000
6.74 yrs
$
6.46
119,760
$
6.47
181,899
4.88 yrs
$
7.48
164,439
$
7.51
100,500
6.14 yrs
$
10.45
69,700
$
11.48
1,804,522
6.67 yrs
$
5.23
1,062,742
$
5.88
Table of Contents
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
(492
)
$
$
(8,552
)
3,771
843
3,279
(7,709
)
(113
)
2
1,217
(637
)
1,104
(635
)
41
$
4,424
$
$
(8,344
)
December 31,
2001
2000
$
1,260
$
812
1,237
898
5,505
3,959
1,767
735
6,745
4,903
428
222
16,942
11,529
(16,890
)
(6,339
)
$
52
$
5,190
$
52
$
202
$
52
$
202
$
$
4,988
Table of Contents
Years Ended December 31,
2001
2000
1999
$
(4,730
)
$
(4,314
)
$
(7,685
)
(408
)
(640
)
(413
)
(14
)
(467
)
713
366
(1,033
)
44
650
(145
)
10,551
3,605
$
4,424
$
$
(8,344
)
Table of Contents
Building
RPC Operation
Closure
Discontinuance
Restructuring
Restructuring
(In thousands)
$
2,225
$
1,639
(511
)
(851
)
(97
)
1,617
788
(815
)
(365
)
(361
)
(615
)
187
62
(162
)
(61
)
25
1
(2
)
(1
)
(23
)
$
$
Table of Contents
December 31,
2001
2000
(In thousands)
$
$
351
908
745
813
894
1,241
269
585
116
$
3,547
$
2,375
Three Months Ended
March 31,
June 30,
Sept. 29,
Dec. 31,
2001
2001
2001
2001
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
10,005
$
9,490
$
8,414
$
23,575
3,400
(181
)
1,682
4,854
(3,784
)
(4,540
)
(5,356
)
(3,256
)
$
(0.32
)
$
(0.38
)
$
(0.45
)
$
(0.27
)
Three Months Ended
April 1,
July 1,
Sept. 30,
Dec. 31,
2000
2000
2000
2000
(In thousands, except per share data)
$
5,892
$
9,191
$
11,036
$
9,930
651
1,808
604
(1,073
)
(2,861
)
(701
)
(3,409
)
(5,353
)
$
(0.24
)
$
(0.06
)
$
(0.29
)
$
(0.45
)
Table of Contents
Item 9. | Changes In and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
The information required by this item is included under the caption Ratification of Independent Public Auditors in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
PART III
Item 10. Directors and Officers of the Registrant
The information required by this item relating to the Companys directors and nominees and disclosure relating to compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is included under the captions Election of Directors and Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference. The information required by this item relating to the Companys executive officers and key employees is included under the caption Executive Officers and Directors under Item 4 in Part I of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 11. Executive Compensation
The information required by this item is included under the caption Executive Compensation and Related Information in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The information required by this item is included under the caption Ownership of Securities in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions
The information required by this item is included under the caption Certain Transactions in the Companys Proxy Statement for the 2002 Annual Meeting of Shareholders and is incorporated herein by reference.
Item 14. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) List of Documents filed as part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
1. The following consolidated financial statements of Intevac, Inc. are filed in Part II, Item 8 of this Report on Form 10-K: |
47
(b)
Reports on Form 8-K
No reports on Form 8-K were filed during the
last quarter of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on
Form 10-K.
48
Report of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent Auditors
Report of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent
Auditors
Consolidated Balance Sheets
December 31, 2001 and 2000
Consolidated Statements of Operations and
Comprehensive Loss for the years ended December 31, 2001,
2000 and 1999
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders
Equity for the years ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the
years ended December 31, 2001, 2000 and 1999
Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements Years Ended December 31, 2001, 2000
and 1999
Table of Contents
2.
Financial
Statement Schedules.
The following financial statement schedule of
Intevac, Inc. is filed in Part IV, Item 14(a) of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K:
Schedule II Valuation and
Qualifying Accounts
All other schedules have been omitted since the
required information is not present in amounts sufficient to
require submission of the schedule or because the information
required is included in the consolidated financial statements or
notes thereto.
3.
Exhibits
Exhibit
Number
Description
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant
Bylaws of the Registrant
Indenture, dated as of February 15, 1997,
between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company of
California, N.A. as Trustee, including the form of the
Convertible Notes
The Registrants 1991 Stock Option/ Stock
Issuance Plan
The Registrants 1995 Stock Option/ Stock
Issuance Plan, as amended
The Registrants Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, as amended
Lease, dated February 5, 2001 regarding the
space located at 3560, 3570 and 3580 Bassett Street, Santa
Clara, California
601 California Avenue LLC Limited Liability
Operating Agreement, dated July 28, 1995
The Registrants 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Lotus
Technologies, Inc., Lewis Lipton, Dennis Stark, Steve Romine and
Intevac, Inc., dated June 6, 1996
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent
Auditors
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent
Auditors
Power of Attorney (see page 46)
*
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-97806)
**
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-05531)
***
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-24275)
****
Incorporated by reference to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized, on March 18, 2002.
INTEVAC, INC. |
BY: | /s/ CHARLES B. EDDY III |
|
|
Charles B. Eddy, III | |
Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) |
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Kevin Fairbairn and Charles B. Eddy III, and each of them, as his true and lawful attorneys-in-fact and agents, with full power of substitution and resubstitution, for him and in his name, place and stead, in any and all capacities, to sign any and all amendments (including post-effective amendments) to this Report on Form 10-K, and to file the same, with all exhibits thereto, and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, granting unto said attorneys-in-fact and agents, and each of them, full power and authority to do and perform each and every act and thing requisite and necessary to be done in connection therewith, as fully to all intents and purposes as he might or could do in person, hereby ratifying and confirming all that said attorneys-in-fact and agents, or any of them, or their or his substitute or substitutes, may lawfully do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature | Title | Date | ||
|
|
|
||
/s/ KEVIN FAIRBAIRN
(Kevin Fairbairn) |
President, Chief Executive Officer and Director (Principal Executive Officer) | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ NORMAN H. POND
(Norman H. Pond) |
Chairman of the Board | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ CHARLES B. EDDY III
(Charles B. Eddy III) |
Vice President, Finance and Administration, Chief Financial Officer Treasurer and Secretary (Principal Financial and Accounting Officer) | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ EDWARD DURBIN
(Edward Durbin) |
Director | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ GEORGE L. FARINSKY
(George L. Farinsky) |
Director | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ ROBERT D. HEMPSTEAD
(Robert D. Hempstead) |
Director | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ DAVID N. LAMBETH
(David N. Lambeth) |
Director | March 18, 2002 | ||
/s/ H. JOSEPH SMEAD
(H. Joseph Smead) |
Director | March 18, 2002 |
49
SCHEDULE II VALUATION AND
QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
INTEVAC, INC.
Additions (Reductions)
Charged
Charged
Balance at
(Credited)
(Credited)
Balance at
Beginning
to Costs and
to Other
End
Description
of Period
Expenses
Accounts
Deductions - Describe(1)
of Period
$
1,629,348
$
151,802
$
0
$
68,074
$
1,713,076
$
1,713,076
$
(1,544,172
)
$
(2,892
)
$
52,500
$
113,512
$
113,512
$
40,415
$
70,833
$
(484
)
$
225,344
(1) | Typically includes write-offs of amounts deemed uncollectible. |
50
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit
Number
Description
* 3.1
Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of
the Registrant
* 3.2
Bylaws of the Registrant
*** 4.2
Indenture, dated as of February 15, 1997,
between the Company and State Street Bank and Trust Company of
California, N.A. as Trustee, including the form of the
Convertible Notes
* 10.1
The Registrants 1991 Stock Option/ Stock
Issuance Plan
* 10.2
The Registrants 1995 Stock Option/ Stock
Issuance Plan, as amended
* 10.3
The Registrants Employee Stock Purchase
Plan, as amended
**** 10.5
Lease, dated February 5, 2001 regarding the
space located at 3560, 3570 and 3580 Bassett Street, Santa
Clara, California
* 10.8
601 California Avenue LLC Limited Liability
Operating Agreement, dated July 28, 1995
* 10.9
The Registrants 401(k) Profit Sharing Plan
** 10.13
Stock Purchase Agreement by and among Lotus
Technologies, Inc., Lewis Lipton, Dennis Stark, Steve Romine and
Intevac, Inc., dated June 6, 1996
21.1
Subsidiaries of the Registrant
23.1
Consent of Grant Thornton LLP, Independent
Auditors
23.2
Consent of Ernst & Young LLP, Independent
Auditors
24.1
Power of Attorney (see page 46)
*
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 33-97806)
**
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-1 (No. 333-05531)
***
Previously filed as an exhibit to the
Registration Statement on Form S-3 (No. 333-24275)
****
Incorporated by reference to the Companys
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2000.
51
EXHIBIT 21.1
SUBSIDIARIES OF THE REGISTRANT
1. Lotus Technologies, Inc. California
2. Intevac Foreign Sales Corporation Barbados
3. Intevac Asia Private Limited Singapore
4. Intevac Malaysia Sdn Bhd Malaysia
5. IRPC, Inc. California
EXHIBIT 23.1
CONSENT OF GRANT THORNTON LLP, INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-99648,
333-35801, 333-65421, 333-96529 and 333-50166) pertaining to the
1995 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan and the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-24275) of Intevac, Inc. of our report dated
January 25, 2002, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule of Intevac, Inc. included in
the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2001.
/s/ GRANT THORNTON LLP
EXHIBIT 23.2
CONSENT OF ERNST & YOUNG LLP, INDEPENDENT
AUDITORS
We consent to the incorporation by reference in
the Registration Statements (Form S-8 Nos. 33-99648,
333-35801, 333-65421, 333-96529 and 333-50166) pertaining to the
1995 Stock Option/ Stock Issuance Plan and the Employee Stock
Purchase Plan and in the Registration Statement (Form S-3
No. 333-24275) of Intevac, Inc. of our report dated
January 21, 2000, with respect to the consolidated
financial statements and schedule for the year ended
December 31, 1999 of Intevac, Inc. included in its Annual
Report (Form 10-K) for the year ended December 31,
2001, filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
San Jose, California
/s/ ERNST & YOUNG LLP